BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Finding the number of odd positive integers

Expert replies
by gmattesttaker2 » Wed Jan 01, 2014 1:41 pm
Hello,

For the following:

How many odd positive integers n are there such that 40,000 < n < 100,000 and n is made up of the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5?

A) 1296
B) 1295
C) 750
D) 749
E) 150

OA: A

I was trying to solve as follows:

The number of digits are 5.

The last digit could be 1 or 3 or 5. Hence, we have 3 choices for the last digit.

The first digit has to be 4 or 5. Hence, we have 2 choices for the first digit.

Now, the digit could be say 41,111 or 41,113 or 41,114 or 41,235

Hence, the number of integers are: ( 2 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 3 )/ ( 3!)

I am dividing by 3! to avoid double counting the repeating digit in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place.

However, I think my answer is wrong since the OA is different.

Can you please assist?

Thanks,
Sri
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:27 pm
gmattesttaker2 wrote: How many odd positive integers n are there such that 40,000 < n < 100,000 and n is made up of the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5?

A) 1296
B) 1295
C) 750
D) 749
E) 150

OA: A
Number of options for the ten-thousands digit = 2. (4 or 5.)
Number of options for the thousands digit = 6. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.)
Number of options for the hundreds digit = 6. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.)
Number of options for the tens digit = 6. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.)
Number of options for the units digit = 3. (1, 3, or 5.)
To combine these options, we multiply:
2*6*6*6*3 = 1296.

The correct answer is A.
I was trying to solve as follows:

The number of digits are 5.

The last digit could be 1 or 3 or 5. Hence, we have 3 choices for the last digit.

The first digit has to be 4 or 5. Hence, we have 2 choices for the first digit.

Now, the digit could be say 41,111 or 41,113 or 41,114 or 41,235

Hence, the number of integers are: ( 2 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 3 )/ ( 3!)

I am dividing by 3! to avoid double counting the repeating digit in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place.
Your solution is perfect until the portion in red.
We would divide by 3! if the order of the 3 middle digits didn't matter -- if 41235 were considered the SAME result at 42315.
But 41235 is a DIFFERENT integer from 42315.
Thus, there is no reason to divide by 3!.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by gmattesttaker2 » Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:45 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
gmattesttaker2 wrote: How many odd positive integers n are there such that 40,000 < n < 100,000 and n is made up of the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5?

A) 1296
B) 1295
C) 750
D) 749
E) 150

OA: A
Number of options for the ten-thousands digit = 2. (4 or 5.)
Number of options for the thousands digit = 6. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.)
Number of options for the hundreds digit = 6. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.)
Number of options for the tens digit = 6. (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5.)
Number of options for the units digit = 3. (1, 3, or 5.)
To combine these options, we multiply:
2*6*6*6*3 = 1296.

The correct answer is A.
I was trying to solve as follows:

The number of digits are 5.

The last digit could be 1 or 3 or 5. Hence, we have 3 choices for the last digit.

The first digit has to be 4 or 5. Hence, we have 2 choices for the first digit.

Now, the digit could be say 41,111 or 41,113 or 41,114 or 41,235

Hence, the number of integers are: ( 2 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 3 )/ ( 3!)

I am dividing by 3! to avoid double counting the repeating digit in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th place.
Your solution is perfect until the portion in red.
We would divide by 3! if the order of the 3 middle digits didn't matter -- if 41235 were considered the SAME result at 42315.
But 41235 is a DIFFERENT integer from 42315.
Thus, there is no reason to divide by 3!.
Hello Mitch,

Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation. It is clear now.

Best Regards,
Sri
Join the discussion