BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number Systems

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Mike@Magoosh » Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:15 am
sukhman wrote:On the number line shown , is zero halfway between r and s
1.s is to the right of zero
2. the distance between t and r is the same distance between t ans -s
The diagram, not included, seems essential to answering this question. Would you have some way to create or include the diagram?
Mike
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion

by sukhman » Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:20 am
there is no diagram , but answer given is C, mine was obviously E
Join the discussion

by Mike@Magoosh » Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:50 pm
sukhman wrote:there is no diagram , but answer given is C, mine was obviously E
Dear Sukman,
I searched the web, and found some versions with simple diagrams. Apparently, this question is originally from GMAT Prep, and the diagram looks something like this

[/img]
Image

On the number line shown , is zero halfway between r and s?
In other words, do r & s have the same absolute value but opposite signs? Does r = -s?

Statement #1: s is to the right of zero
By itself, this tells us nothing. Point r could be anywhere, to right or left of zero. This statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient.

Statement #2: the distance between t and r is the same distance between t ans -s
Well, this certainly would be true if r = -s, so that they were at one and the same place. That would give a "yes" answer to the prompt.
BUT, imagine if, say, r = -4, s = -2, and t = -1. Then -s = +2, and both r = -4 and -s = +2 are a distance of 3 from t = -1. This would be consistent with the statement, and would produce a "no" response to the prompt.
Because we can find either a "yes" or "no" answer to the prompt consistent with this statement, this statement does not allow us to isolate a single definitive answer. Therefore, this statement, alone and by itself, is insufficient.

Now, the very tricky part of the problem: the combined statements:
Combined:
s is to the right of zero
the distance between t and r is the same distance between t ans -s
Well, let's think about this. Both s and t must be positive numbers, so -s will be a negative number. Well, if r is positive, there is no way the distance from positive number t to positive number r would be the same as the the distance from positive number t to negative number -s. Therefore, from the second statement, we know r must be negative. Therefore, r and -s are both negative numbers. so is positive number t is the same distance from both of them, this means r and -s must be at the exact same place on the number line. In other words, r = -s, an answer of "yes" to our prompt question. Combined, the statements are sufficient.
OA = [spoiler](C)[/spoiler]

It may be that you found an answer of (E) because you didn't have a diagram. If the problem says "in the diagram" and wherever you found the problem doesn't have a diagram, chances are very very good that you will be operating with inadequate information, and may well get the question incorrect precisely because you have inadequate information. If you do a Google search by the text of the problem, you can often find other places on the web where that problem is posted, and chances are good that you find any relevant diagram.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion