Hi All, quick, general GMAT question. I have read that the GMAT's adaptive nature tries to align difficulty of questions to the test taker's ability such that the test taker gets ~50% correct. Oddly, I took the official GMATPrep exam and got only 14/37 quant questions incorrect, about 38%. Why didn't the exam give me harder questions? Does it have to do with the fact that I ended on a streak of 8 correct? Another important fact worth mentioning is that I didn't get a particularly high score on the quant - right around 50th percentile, actually. This tells me that there were harder questions I could have gotten?
Also, a slightly unrelated questions, I am assuming the GMATPrep software does not mimic the exact functionality of the GMAT - correct? If it did, wouldn't smarter people than me be able to look up the code that determines the scoring / questions selection algorithm and reveal the secret? Is that what's driving the odd results?
IMO, 38% is far enough away from 50% to be weird.
Which of the following best explain the discrepancy? Just kidding, no answer choices
Also, a slightly unrelated questions, I am assuming the GMATPrep software does not mimic the exact functionality of the GMAT - correct? If it did, wouldn't smarter people than me be able to look up the code that determines the scoring / questions selection algorithm and reveal the secret? Is that what's driving the odd results?
IMO, 38% is far enough away from 50% to be weird.
Which of the following best explain the discrepancy? Just kidding, no answer choices


















