BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by santa_dem » Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:25 am
First, you should know what you are comparing.

The least height in every class is the greatest height-the range.

So,

for A the least height is g-r

for B, the least height is h-s.

So we have to compare (h-s) with (g-r).

First statement gives us that r<s, but nothing about h and g.

Second statement, gives us that g>h, but nothing about s and r.
So the statements taken separately cannot solve the problem.

If we take both statements, we have that g>h and r<s. Now remember what we are comparing.

They ask you if (g-r)>(h-s). This can be written as g-r-(h-s)>0, or

(g-h)+(s-r)>0. We know that both terms are positive (g>h and s>r), so the sum has to be positive.

We solved the problem using both statements, so both together are sufficient.
Join the discussion