BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is xy > ab ?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Lifetron » Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:58 pm
Is it E ?
Join the discussion

by Anju@Gurome » Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:08 pm
himu wrote:Is xy > ab ?

b/x > y/a

(ab)^2 >(xy)^2
As we know that signs of inequality changes depending upon the signs of the variables, we always need to check for both positive and negative scenarios while dealing with inequalities.

Consider the following two cases,
  • a = 1, b = 2, x = 1, y = 0 ---> xy < ab ---> NO
    a = 1, b = -2, x = -1, y = 0 ---> xy > ab ---> YES
The correct answer is E.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:13 am
himu wrote:Is xy > ab ?

b/x > y/a

(ab)^2 >(xy)^2
I received a PM asking me to explain why b/x > y/a does not imply that ab > xy.
The reason is that the signs of the denominators (a and x) are UNKNOWN.

To illustrate:
If a<0 and x>0, then ax<0.
Multiplying each side of an inequality by a negative value requires that the direction of the inequality change.
Thus, if each side of b/x > y/a is multiplied by ax<0 -- a NEGATIVE value -- then the direction of the inequality must CHANGE from > to <:
b/x > y/a
ax * (b/x) * x < ax * (y/a)
ab < xy.

Thus, b/x > y/a does not necessarily imply that ab > xy.
When the signs of the denominators are unknown, it is usually safer to plug in values.

Statement 1: b/x > y/a.
Case 1:
Try to plug in values so that xy≥0 and ab<0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES: xy > ab.
If possible, plug in values that also satisfy statement 2.

If x=1 and y=1, and a=-2 and b=1, both statements are satisfied:
b/x > y/a --> 1/1 > 1/(-2)
(ab)² > (xy)² --> (-2*1)² > (1*1)².

In this case, xy>0 and ab<0, so xy > ab.

Case 2:
Try to plug in values so that xy<0 and ab≥0, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO: xy < ab.
If possible, plug in values that also satisfy statement 2.

If x=1 and y=-1, and a=2 and b=1, both statements are satisfied:
b/x > y/a --> 1/1 > (-1)/2
(ab)² > (xy)² --> (2*1)² > (1 * (-1))².

In this case, xy<0 and ab>0, so xy < ab.

Since xy > ab in the first case and xy < ab in the second case, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by himu » Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:34 pm
Hi Anju & GMATGuru,

I understood where I was going wrong :)

thanks for helping me out !


Cheers,
~Himu.
Join the discussion