BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number between 2/3 and 3/4

Expert replies
by independent » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:19 am
Ok guys, either am I doing something wrong or the OA is incorrect. Here is the problem:

Which of the following numbers does not fall between 2/3 and 3/4?

A: 5/7
B: 7/11
C: 8/11
D: 9/13
E: 11/14

OA: E

I got B

Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by vk_vinayak » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:42 am
independent wrote:Ok guys, either am I doing something wrong or the OA is incorrect. Here is the problem:

Which of the following numbers does not fall between 2/3 and 3/4?

A: 5/7
B: 7/11
C: 8/11
D: 9/13
E: 11/14

OA: E

I got B

Thanks in advance.
2/3 =0.66 and 3/4=0.75 We need to find a number that is either less than 0.66 or more than 0.75

A: 5/7 = 0.71
B: 7/11 = 0.63
C: 8/11 = 0.72
D: 9/13 = 0.69
E: 11/14 = 0.78

Both B and E are correct.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Join the discussion

by independent » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:46 am
vk_vinayak wrote:
independent wrote:Ok guys, either am I doing something wrong or the OA is incorrect. Here is the problem:

Which of the following numbers does not fall between 2/3 and 3/4?

A: 5/7
B: 7/11
C: 8/11
D: 9/13
E: 11/14

OA: E

I got B

Thanks in advance.
2/3 =0.66 and 3/4=0.75 We need to find a number that is either less than 0.66 or more than 0.75

A: 5/7 = 0.71
B: 7/11 = 0.63
C: 8/11 = 0.72
D: 9/13 = 0.69
E: 11/14 = 0.78

Both B and E are correct.
Thanks. Then there is a mistake because only one was supposed to be correct.
Join the discussion

by cypherskull » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:16 pm
Yep. I got the same thing. Both B & E are correct.

Although, I learned an interesting technique of comparing fractions which saves me a lot of time I used to take in calculating decimal equivalents. Sharing it just in case anyone finds it useful.

Considering the 2 fractions - 2/3 (LHS) and 3/4 (RHS). We want to determine which is greater.

1) Cross-multiply the 2 fractions - 2*4 (LHS) and 3*3 (RHS), i.e., 8 (LHS) and 9 (RHS).
2) As seen from step 1, RHS (right hand side) is higher.
3) So, 3/4 > 2/3.


Consider, 7/11 (LHS) & 11/12 (RHS).

Cross-multiplying yields, 84 and 121. So, 11/12 (RHS) is greater.

Apply it to any fraction...it works!!!
Regards,
Sunit

________________________________

Kill all my demons..And my angels might die too!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:10 pm
cypherskull wrote: Sharing it just in case anyone finds it useful.

Considering the 2 fractions - 2/3 (LHS) and 3/4 (RHS). We want to determine which is greater.

1) Cross-multiply the 2 fractions - 2*4 (LHS) and 3*3 (RHS), i.e., 8 (LHS) and 9 (RHS).
2) As seen from step 1, RHS (right hand side) is higher.
3) So, 3/4 > 2/3.


Consider, 7/11 (LHS) & 11/12 (RHS).

Cross-multiplying yields, 84 and 121. So, 11/12 (RHS) is greater.

Apply it to any fraction...it works!!!
It might be useful to understand just why this works - it's something you've certainly done many times (but in a slightly different way) before learning it as a 'trick'. If you take the fractions 7/11 and 11/12, then one way to compare them is to get a common denominator. We can use 11*12. Then our fractions would be (7*11)/(11*12) and (11*11)/(11*12). Now whichever fraction has the larger numerator has the larger overall value. Notice the numerators here are exactly what you got using the 'cross-multiplying trick'.

So when you use that 'cross-multiplying' trick, you're just finding a common denominator, but you aren't writing that denominator down. One reason it can be useful to understand just what you're doing in these situations is that it may let you save a lot of time. If you need to compare the fractions 13/18 and 17/24, say, cross-multiplying certainly isn't very fast. It's much faster to notice we can use a common denominator of 72:

13/18 = 52/72
17/24 = 51/72

so 13/18 is larger.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by mohan514 » Fri Aug 31, 2012 8:50 am
contrvversial and easy to poinjt out question

both are satisfying the condition
Join the discussion