referrent they

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 11:01 pm
Thanked: 1 times

referrent they

by Dante » Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:24 pm
While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners. whose equity--in many cases representing a life's savings--can plunge or even disappear.
(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose


A is OA. Can someone explain why wouldn't "they" refer to both property values and large investors in this case. Is it because of preceding while ??. I saw many cases when 2 plural subjects precede, then they is avoided as it creates amiguity.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 188
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:40 am
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 4 times

by senthil » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:33 am
On ruling out all the other options I feel the answer should be A . but as asked they can refer to both property values and investors . But here other than 'they' i wonder how can property values can be referred .Option B cud be correct provide the second part contains THEY .


If I am wrong please let me know

Senthil

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:37 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by pranavc » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:46 am
Well, the subject, this in case boils down to "depressed property values" and NOT "large investors". Moving along with the sentence, it becomes even more obvious because the effect of "depressed property values" is highlighted and NOT that of "large investors". I hope this helps.

Regards,

Pranav

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: referrent they

by lunarpower » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:24 am
Dante wrote:While depressed property values can hurt some large investors, they are potentially devastating for home-owners. whose equity--in many cases representing a life's savings--can plunge or even disappear.
(A) they are potentially devastating for homeowners, whose
(B) they can potentially devastate homeowners in that their
(C) for homeowners they are potentially devastating, because their
(D) for homeowners, it is potentially devastating in that their
(E) it can potentially devastate homeowners, whose


A is OA. Can someone explain why wouldn't "they" refer to both property values and large investors in this case. Is it because of preceding while ??. I saw many cases when 2 plural subjects precede, then they is avoided as it creates amiguity.
here's the deal.
yes, you are right: the pronoun 'they'/'their' is technically ambiguous. however, it's ambiguous in ALL FOUR answer choices that use it.
i have never seen an official problem using a technically ambiguous pronoun in a correct answer, unless ALL the other answer choices were also ambiguous.
so, you're on track: first look for the ambiguity, and then, if the ambiguity is universal, then just take a deep breath and look for other criteria on which to rule out answer choices.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

• Page 1 of 1