- bagchibhai
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:40 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
I originally started on my GMAT journey in Feb 2012. I had always planned to write the GMAT, but had put it off to "some other time", just like a lot of people on this blog. Finally last December I decided to get my act together and enrolled myself in the Manhattan GMAT course on the recommendation of a friend. Halfway into the course I booked myself a test date in May and prepared as best I could. Test day arrived and I made it to the test centre a little early to ensure I wouldn't be late. The test seemed to go OK, so imagine my surprise & disappointment when I saw my unofficial score and it was lower than what I had been scoring on my practice tests. I was a little crushed at this, knowing that I would have to deal with Integrated Reasoning.
While 680 (V-40/M-43) is a good enough score to get into several MBA programs, I knew that I would need a higher score for the 2 programs I want to get into most: INSEAD and LBS. It took me a few days to come to grips with my "failure"; I'm the kind of person who likes to prepare properly and do things once. I decided to take some time off, I had family visiting me in May and I spent my time away from the GMAT books to gain some perspective.
Manhattan GMAT offers a post-exam assessment where one of their GMAT instructors (someone other than the who you take classes with) goes over your exam experience in detail. They also time you on problems to gauge your speed and accuracy. The reviewer was very perceptive and went over my practice test results (on MGMAT's website) and helped identify the areas in my math prep that I needed to work on.
Having taken this advise on board I used the MGMAT analysis tools to evaluate my performance on the last 3 practice tests I had done and started to work on the 9 math topics I identified. There was no magic method to improving my performance: just reviewed each topic and practiced the official GMAT problems suggested by the MGMAT material. The MGMAT prep material also includes several online labs that teach you how to approach Data Sufficiency, Sentence Correction etc. I found reviewing these very helpful, especially as I knew what I was looking for having done several questions. Also, doing the extra problems on MGMAT helped identify some of the tricks the GMAT questions makers build into D/S questions.
So I had 30 days (test date July 3rd) and I needed a plan to succeed: 9 math topics and 5 more in verbal to concentrate on. The system I used was -
Day 1: concentrate on 1 topic - review fundamentals and do problems
Day 2: do a list of general problems - 10 math + 10 verbal
Rinse & repeat!
I did 2 more practice exams, both from the official GMAT Prep 2.0 program: this seems to be much more representative of the difficulty on the actual GMAT exam. Also, their practice questions (90 of them) are great.
The result of all this: 710 (M-48/V-40) & I haven't received my official report yet, but I believe I did well enough on IR to get a score of 6, the essays I am not to worried about.
I also have to thank some people for my success: Avi Gutman (great instructor and always available to help with questions) & Brett Beach-Kimball (reviewed my GMAT experience) & Stacy Koprince (your reviews of the IR topics were invaluable) of Manhattan GMAT. BTG users 'havok' and 'myohmy': your posts on your GMAT experiences really helped with my prep the second time of writing.
While 680 (V-40/M-43) is a good enough score to get into several MBA programs, I knew that I would need a higher score for the 2 programs I want to get into most: INSEAD and LBS. It took me a few days to come to grips with my "failure"; I'm the kind of person who likes to prepare properly and do things once. I decided to take some time off, I had family visiting me in May and I spent my time away from the GMAT books to gain some perspective.
Manhattan GMAT offers a post-exam assessment where one of their GMAT instructors (someone other than the who you take classes with) goes over your exam experience in detail. They also time you on problems to gauge your speed and accuracy. The reviewer was very perceptive and went over my practice test results (on MGMAT's website) and helped identify the areas in my math prep that I needed to work on.
Having taken this advise on board I used the MGMAT analysis tools to evaluate my performance on the last 3 practice tests I had done and started to work on the 9 math topics I identified. There was no magic method to improving my performance: just reviewed each topic and practiced the official GMAT problems suggested by the MGMAT material. The MGMAT prep material also includes several online labs that teach you how to approach Data Sufficiency, Sentence Correction etc. I found reviewing these very helpful, especially as I knew what I was looking for having done several questions. Also, doing the extra problems on MGMAT helped identify some of the tricks the GMAT questions makers build into D/S questions.
So I had 30 days (test date July 3rd) and I needed a plan to succeed: 9 math topics and 5 more in verbal to concentrate on. The system I used was -
Day 1: concentrate on 1 topic - review fundamentals and do problems
Day 2: do a list of general problems - 10 math + 10 verbal
Rinse & repeat!
I did 2 more practice exams, both from the official GMAT Prep 2.0 program: this seems to be much more representative of the difficulty on the actual GMAT exam. Also, their practice questions (90 of them) are great.
The result of all this: 710 (M-48/V-40) & I haven't received my official report yet, but I believe I did well enough on IR to get a score of 6, the essays I am not to worried about.
I also have to thank some people for my success: Avi Gutman (great instructor and always available to help with questions) & Brett Beach-Kimball (reviewed my GMAT experience) & Stacy Koprince (your reviews of the IR topics were invaluable) of Manhattan GMAT. BTG users 'havok' and 'myohmy': your posts on your GMAT experiences really helped with my prep the second time of writing.












