BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Divisibility & Primes - GMAT QR question

Expert replies
by adthedaddy » Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:44 pm
Following is the question from GMAT Quant Review 1st Edition (Pg.182, Solution to Ques. No. 86)

Q. Can the positive integer 'n' be written as the sum of two different positive prime numbers ?
(1) 'n' is greater than 3.
(2) 'n' is odd.

There is already a solution given in the QR but I am not able to understand the same.

Request my friends to plz help me with a simpler and understandable solution.
Thanks in advance :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by niketdoshi123 » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:12 pm
adthedaddy wrote:Following is the question from GMAT Quant Review 1st Edition (Pg.182, Solution to Ques. No. 86)

Q. Can the positive integer 'n' be written as the sum of two different positive prime numbers ?
(1) 'n' is greater than 3.
(2) 'n' is odd.

There is already a solution given in the QR but I am not able to understand the same.

Request my friends to plz help me with a simpler and understandable solution.
Thanks in advance :)
statement 1:

n>3
let n = 4
4 can be written as the sum of two positive numbers in two ways
4 = 2 + 2
4 = 1 + 3
In each of the above ways there is just 1 different prime number.
Hence n = 4 CANNOT be written as the sum of 2 different positive prime numbers. Ans is NO

Let n = 5
5 can be written as the sum of two positive numbers in two ways
5 = 2 + 3
5 = 4 + 1
We can see that n = 5 CAN be written as the sum of 2 different positive prime numbers. Ans is YES

Hence the statement is insufficient to answer the question.

Statement 2:

n is odd
We need to find whether n is sum of 2 different positive prime numbers

Here we have to apply two properties
1) odd + even = odd
odd + odd = even
even + even = even
2) there is only one even prime number, 2.

Hence , n (odd) = 2 + odd number
Let n = 11
11 = 2 + odd number => odd number = 9, but 9 is not a prime number.
Hence n = 11 cannot be written as the sum of 2 different prime numbers. Ans is NO

we proved in the above statement that n = 5 can be written as the sum of 2 different prime numbers. Ans is YES

hence the statement is insufficient to answer the question.

Combining both the statements

we can use both the examples used in statement 2 and prove insufficiency.

the correct answer is E
Join the discussion