gmatter2012 wrote:
"....................................................................................................
.........Now the difference between J's age and all lee's age after 20 years is still x ( Their age difference all always remain x, suppose I am 2 years older than my small brother , then 20( or 30 or 40 or any number ) years down the line , I will still be 2 years older than my brother. Because my brother has also grown similar number years as me .............."
well I got it to some extent,The portion above is not entirely true. This could have been true if there was one Lee. But there are 3 Lee's.
so the difference between 3 Lee's age and J's age after 20 years in not x but something else, what is that? can we find that out , is there a relationship?
suppose I am two years older than the sum of the ages of my 2 small brothers
so Suppose my age is 30 and my small brothers each are 14 so 30 -2(14) = 2 ...( first relation )
now 5 years down the line this relation will not hold
after 5 years my age 35
my brothers age each 14 + 5 = 19 so both the brothers age total =38
Now difference between my age and 2 bothers total age = 35-2(19)= -3
so as we can see the first relation does not hold after 5 years
similarly in J's case and Lee's case, the initial difference of X does not hold after 20 years.
so what could be the difference after 20 years?
can we solve the problem this way? or is it not possible this way and have to approach in some other ways.
I think if we can get x after 20 years ( age difference between J and 3 Lee's after 20 years ) we will arrive at the given OA.