BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Probability question - Need expert help

Expert replies
by voodoo_child » Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:57 am
If a bin contains twenty cards numbered 1, 2, ..., 20, what is the probability that the sum of the numbers on two cards extracted from the bin will be even?

a) 1/2
b) 9/19
3) ....

OA - b)

How do I know whether the cards are drawn with or without replacement? There is nothing indicated in the question. The source of this question is GMATClub. I am not sure how GMAC would ask such a question. Any thoughts?

With replacement => prob = 1/2
Without replacement => prob = 9/19. The calculation is straightforward for both the options.


Thoughts?

NB - Experts: I am NOT LOOKING FOR THE SOLUTION BUT THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTION ABOVE.

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by KapTeacherEli » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:00 am
Hi voodoo_child,

Note the language "the numbers on two cards." This unambiguously means two separate cards! If it were phrased, "two cards are drawn from the bin," or worse, "after two draws from the bin," then there might be untestlike lack of clarity. But here, there is no doubt that there is no replacement.

Hope this helps!
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion

by shekhar.kataria » Sat Jul 14, 2012 4:44 am
Hi KapTeacherEli

Even i was stumped at the same point. I now understand the difference in the phrases after your explanation. Thanks

However, the question is will GMAC use such confusing phrases in test Questions. If yes, Can you please point out any sample question, which has this much level of confusion in language, from GMAC authenticated source or from any OG book,


KapTeacherEli wrote:Hi voodoo_child,

Note the language "the numbers on two cards." This unambiguously means two separate cards! If it were phrased, "two cards are drawn from the bin," or worse, "after two draws from the bin," then there might be untestlike lack of clarity. But here, there is no doubt that there is no replacement.

Hope this helps!
Restlessness and discontent are the first necessities of progress.--Thomas A. Edison

If you find this post helpful, let me know by clicking thanks above :-)
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:06 am
shekhar.kataria wrote:Hi KapTeacherEli

Even i was stumped at the same point. I now understand the difference in the phrases after your explanation. Thanks

However, the question is will GMAC use such confusing phrases in test Questions. If yes, Can you please point out any sample question, which has this much level of confusion in language, from GMAC authenticated source or from any OG book,


KapTeacherEli wrote:Hi voodoo_child,

Note the language "the numbers on two cards." This unambiguously means two separate cards! If it were phrased, "two cards are drawn from the bin," or worse, "after two draws from the bin," then there might be untestlike lack of clarity. But here, there is no doubt that there is no replacement.

Hope this helps!
Here's a basic rule that should clear things up:

If you are told you are selecting multiple objects-- "three markers," "four fruit," "two cards," you can always assume they are selected without replacement--three makers, for instance, means "three different markers" by definition. Of course, the GMAT might include language like "without replacement" anyway, just to play safe, but it's not required.

The ambiguity that must be avoid comes from referencing the selections themselves--"the sum of two selections," "two draws from a deck," "your third fruit choice," "the result of the fourth drawing in the lottery." But you never need to worry, because the GMAT will always specify that there is no replacement (or that there is replacement!) if there is significant ambiguity in the question text.
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion