-
karthikpandian19
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
- Thanked: 165 times
- Followed by:70 members
Cloning is a scientific process that produces genetic copies of animals by replacing the nucleus of an unfertilized egg cell with the nucleus of an egg cell drawn from another organism. The altered egg, which is then considered "fertilized," is planted into the womb of a host animal; the offspring resulting from this pregnancy will be an exact genetic replica of the organism that provided the replacement nucleus. Recently, cloning has been used to generate animal populations for the purpose of food production. Despite several benefits, this practice-known as clone harvesting-has proven to be controversial.
Meat and dairy industries can use cloning technologies to produce exact genetic replicas of the healthiest and most fertile cows and bulls. After the first successful cloning of a mammal in 1996, cloning technology in livestock production progressed at an aggressive pace and cloning, as a result, soon became one of the most popular alternative breeding techniques. Because cloning livestock is expensive, clones are generally not slaughtered for meat; instead, they are used to produce superior offspring for mass food production. Research groups are working on genetically engineering cattle that could produce insulin-containing milk for people who suffer from diabetes, or livestock whose meat could release clotting factors that would prove useful in treating patients with hemophilia. Because conventional breeding does not guarantee that genetic modifications will transfer to offspring, cloning is necessary to replicate these modifications.
In 2001, however, in response to observations that cloned animals are sometimes born sickly, deformed, and beset with neonatal diseases, the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) demanded a moratorium on the sale of food products derived from animal clones and their offspring until further research could be conducted. Scientists then determined that the majority of neonatal problems in clones arise from epigenetic, or environmental, factors. Because such problems are not DNA-based, cloned animals are unlikely to transfer them to their offspring. The FDA wisely lifted this moratorium in 2008, concluding that the risk of consuming products from cloned sources was no higher than that of consuming products from non-cloned sources. Furthermore, scientists discovered that deformities occur at similar rates when other alternative breeding techniques, such as embryo transfer and in-vitro fertilization, are employed.
Detractors of animal cloning point to the potential for unanticipated problems associated with the reduction of biodiversity in livestock breeding pools that results from the cloning process. A herd of clones bred from a single animal is highly vulnerable to contagious disease, because an animal's offspring tends to possess the same immunities as its progenitors, and a cloned animal has only one progenitor. Because the long-term environmental consequences of such practices have not been investigated, some argue that the FDA should reissue the moratorium. Moreover, many remain deeply uncomfortable with cloned meat; over 70% of consumers claim in surveys that they would not knowingly consume cloned animal meat.
According to the passage, with which of the following statements would the detractors of animal clone harvesting most likely agree?
(A) The biodiversity of the livestock gene pool should not be a significant public health consideration.
(B) Breeding a herd of clones from a single cow will not result in a reduction of genetic biodiversity if no member of that herd falls victim to a contagious disease.
(C) The unwillingness of many consumers to eat cloned meat will likely result in an investigation of the long-term environmental consequences of livestock clone harvesting.
(D) Limiting the genetic biodiversity of a group of sheep may decrease its natural ability to defend against certain diseases.
(E) Neonatal problems in cloned animals are more likely to be epigenetic in origin than are neonatal problems in their non-cloned counterparts.
Meat and dairy industries can use cloning technologies to produce exact genetic replicas of the healthiest and most fertile cows and bulls. After the first successful cloning of a mammal in 1996, cloning technology in livestock production progressed at an aggressive pace and cloning, as a result, soon became one of the most popular alternative breeding techniques. Because cloning livestock is expensive, clones are generally not slaughtered for meat; instead, they are used to produce superior offspring for mass food production. Research groups are working on genetically engineering cattle that could produce insulin-containing milk for people who suffer from diabetes, or livestock whose meat could release clotting factors that would prove useful in treating patients with hemophilia. Because conventional breeding does not guarantee that genetic modifications will transfer to offspring, cloning is necessary to replicate these modifications.
In 2001, however, in response to observations that cloned animals are sometimes born sickly, deformed, and beset with neonatal diseases, the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) demanded a moratorium on the sale of food products derived from animal clones and their offspring until further research could be conducted. Scientists then determined that the majority of neonatal problems in clones arise from epigenetic, or environmental, factors. Because such problems are not DNA-based, cloned animals are unlikely to transfer them to their offspring. The FDA wisely lifted this moratorium in 2008, concluding that the risk of consuming products from cloned sources was no higher than that of consuming products from non-cloned sources. Furthermore, scientists discovered that deformities occur at similar rates when other alternative breeding techniques, such as embryo transfer and in-vitro fertilization, are employed.
Detractors of animal cloning point to the potential for unanticipated problems associated with the reduction of biodiversity in livestock breeding pools that results from the cloning process. A herd of clones bred from a single animal is highly vulnerable to contagious disease, because an animal's offspring tends to possess the same immunities as its progenitors, and a cloned animal has only one progenitor. Because the long-term environmental consequences of such practices have not been investigated, some argue that the FDA should reissue the moratorium. Moreover, many remain deeply uncomfortable with cloned meat; over 70% of consumers claim in surveys that they would not knowingly consume cloned animal meat.
According to the passage, with which of the following statements would the detractors of animal clone harvesting most likely agree?
(A) The biodiversity of the livestock gene pool should not be a significant public health consideration.
(B) Breeding a herd of clones from a single cow will not result in a reduction of genetic biodiversity if no member of that herd falls victim to a contagious disease.
(C) The unwillingness of many consumers to eat cloned meat will likely result in an investigation of the long-term environmental consequences of livestock clone harvesting.
(D) Limiting the genetic biodiversity of a group of sheep may decrease its natural ability to defend against certain diseases.
(E) Neonatal problems in cloned animals are more likely to be epigenetic in origin than are neonatal problems in their non-cloned counterparts.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank"
---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON
---If you find my post useful, click "Thank"
------Never stop until cracking GMAT---
