graph - need expert help

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:24 am
Changed my mind. I think that it should be :
Image

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:12 pm
Thanked: 339 times
Followed by:49 members
GMAT Score:770

by eagleeye » Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:37 am
voodoo_child wrote:Changed my mind. I think that it should be :
Image
I don't have graphing capabilities right now but you could do this.

Draw the lines y=x and y = -x on the graph. Then |y| > |x| is the area between these two lines and the y-axis.

Hence the image you just showed would also have a component (actually a mirror image of what you just shaded) underneath the x-axis in the 3rd and 4th quadrants.

Alternatively:

go to : https://www.desmos.com/calculator
And enter the following two equations:
y > abs(x)
y <-abs(x)

The graph that results is the answer.
Let me know if this helps :)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:40 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 186 times
Followed by:29 members

by aneesh.kg » Fri Jun 29, 2012 8:50 am
voodoo_child wrote:Changed my mind. I think that it should be :
Image
The second image posted by you is
y > |x|

For
|y| > |x|
|y| can be y or -y, so all the values that satisfy y > |x| and the negative value of all these values of y will satisfy the inequality.

For example,
if |5| > |3|, |-5| is also > |3|.

The mirror image of the curve drawn in the second image about the X-axis gives us -y for each y that satisfies y > |x|. So, all that combined region (above and below the X-axis) is the region for |y| > |x|.
Aneesh Bangia
GMAT Math Coach
[email protected]

GMATPad:
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/GMATPad

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
Followed by:523 members
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Fri Jun 29, 2012 9:24 am
voodoo_child wrote:Can anyone suggest how would the graph of |y|>|X| look like?
|y| > |x| simply means absolute value of y is greater than that of x.
Hence, the graph of |y| > |x| will contain those points for which absolute value of y-coordinate is more than that of x-coordinate.

In other words, the graph will contain all the points in the region bounded by y = x and y = -x which contain the y-axis.

Image
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Fri Jun 29, 2012 1:10 pm
Dear voodoo child,

I've attached an image of the graph of the region |y| > |x|. Basically, that's a mathematical way of saying --- closer to the y-axis than to the x-axis.

Also, you may find this blogpost on related topics interesting.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-math- ... -line-y-x/

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)
Attachments
abs(y) greater than abs(x).JPG
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:08 am
Mike,
Thanks for your reply. However, I tried plotting the graph using the online tool mentioned by one of the posters above. It's a really good tool. I am not sure why you have only highlighted the second and the third quadrant. HEre's what I plotted. I think that logically this graph makes sense. Can you please explain the difference?


Thanks
Voodoo
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:52 am
voodoo_child wrote:Mike,
Thanks for your reply. However, I tried plotting the graph using the online tool mentioned by one of the posters above. It's a really good tool. I am not sure why you have only highlighted the second and the third quadrant. Here's what I plotted. I think that logically this graph makes sense. Can you please explain the difference?
Thanks
Voodoo
Dear Voodoo: I don't understand what you mean when you say "I am not sure why you have only highlighted the second and the third quadrant." The region |y| > |x| occupies part of each of the four quadrants. Are you asking why my graph is all of the same color? It really should be all one color, not two, because |y| > |x| is one contiguous region. It's true, some graphing programs, like the one eagleeye recommended, require the input of two different inequalities to graph this single region, but that doesn't change the fact that it's one contiguous thing. I'm not sure what you're asking.

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:42 am
Mike@Magoosh wrote:
voodoo_child wrote:Mike,
Thanks for your reply. However, I tried plotting the graph using the online tool mentioned by one of the posters above. It's a really good tool. I am not sure why you have only highlighted the second and the third quadrant. Here's what I plotted. I think that logically this graph makes sense. Can you please explain the difference?
Thanks
Voodoo
Dear Voodoo: I don't understand what you mean when you say "I am not sure why you have only highlighted the second and the third quadrant." The region |y| > |x| occupies part of each of the four quadrants. Are you asking why my graph is all of the same color? It really should be all one color, not two, because |y| > |x| is one contiguous region. It's true, some graphing programs, like the one eagleeye recommended, require the input of two different inequalities to graph this single region, but that doesn't change the fact that it's one contiguous thing. I'm not sure what you're asking.

Mike :)

Thanks Mike. I just got confused by the diagram drawn by you because you have shown only the second and the third quadrant. I was wondering why the first and the fourth quadrant are not drawn or shown. Yes, I see that |y| > |x| must occupy all four quadrants. It's a typical "hour glass" type of graph.

Thanks

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:01 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by intercostalcom » Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:45 am
You have to start from definition of the absolute value:
absX = X, when X>0
absX = -X, when X<0
apply that to X and Y in each quadrant and you get solution

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:57 am
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Dear voodoo child,

I've attached an image of the graph of the region |y| > |x|. Basically, that's a mathematical way of saying --- closer to the y-axis than to the x-axis.

Also, you may find this blogpost on related topics interesting.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-math- ... -line-y-x/

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)
Mike,

Here's the question that was troubling me. I am not able to rule out Option A.

If ab#0 and |a| < |b| , which of the following must be negative?

a) (a-b)/b
b) (a-b)/(a+b)
c) a^b - b^a
d) a"-"(b/(a-b)) -- this is a fraction form. e.g. 1"-"2/3 = (3*1 + 2)/3. I don't know how to represent such form on the forum.
e) (b-a)/b


OA - B
After some thought, I was able to understand why C, D and E could be positive. However, I am not sure about a.

Also, I took greater than 5 minutes on this question. It will be really helpful if you could provide some shortcut tip to rule other answer choices.


Appreciate your help in advance.

Voodoo

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:56 am
voodoo_child wrote: If ab#0 and |a| < |b| , which of the following must be negative?

a) (a-b)/b
b) (a-b)/(a+b)
c) a^b - b^a

d) a"-"(b/(a-b)) -- this is a fraction form. e.g. 1"-"2/3 = (3*1 + 2)/3. I don't know how to represent such form on the forum.
e) (b-a)/b
Dear Voodoo_Child
I will admit, first of all, I have absolutely no idea what you intend in choice (d) --- normally, you can write any nested fractions with enough brackets and parentheses.

Given ab/= 0, we know neither one is zero.

Given |a| < |b|, we know the absolute value of b is greater than the absolute value of a, but they can be positive and negative in any combination. Basically, we have to consider (a, b) as (3, 5), (-3, 5), (3, -5), and (-3, -5). The first one is the obviously stupid one that everyone will try, so I would not rely too heavily on that. The two mixed sign examples, (-3, 5) and (3, -5), are the two that the unwashed masses are most likely to forget, so the answer choices are somewhat more likely to work for the same sign answers and not work for these mixed sign answers, so I would be likely to test those first. That's a general strategy. With the individual expressions, I would look for ways to adjust the signs to make the expression positive --- as soon as I can make it positive in some possible way, I can eliminate it as an answer.

Now, with (a) as you have it written ----
a) (a-b)/b --->
If b is negative, then the denominator is negative, and subtracting b in the numerator makes it positive; since |a| < |b|, whether we add or subtract a, the different in the numerator will still be positive. Positive over negative --- fraction is negative.
If b is positive, then the denominator is positive, and subtracting b in the numerator makes it negative; since |a| < |b|, whether we add or subtract a, the different in the numerator will still be negative. Negative over positive--- fraction is negative.
(a) as you have it written, is always negative.

Given the fact that I can't even make sense of what you intend for (d), I suspect you may not have all the choices written correctly here. What is the original source for this question? Would there be a way for me to see it in the original?

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by voodoo_child » Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:00 pm
Mike,
thanks for your reply. the source is GMATCLub math test. The question is m14 q33.

D) is {[a*(a-b)]+b}/ {a-b}

About A) - there is a typo - it should be a/b - b/a. (https://gmatclub.com/forum/m14-134213.html)

What is the shortcut to do such problems in < 2 minutes? My mind started spinning while doing this problem under test conditions. I missed it because Choice A) seemed good to me.

This was a killer problem.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
voodoo_child wrote:what is the shortcut to do such problems in < 2 minutes? My mind started spinning while doing this problem under test conditions. I missed it because Choice A) seemed good to me. This was a killer problem.
Dear Voodoo-Child

First of all, I'll say the way this post began, with the graph of |y|>|x|, is leagues away from the fastest way to answer this question.

If ab≠0 and |a|<|b|, which of the following must be negative?
A. (a/b)− (b/a)
B. (a−b)/(a+b)
C. a^b−b^a
D. a(b/(a−b))
E. (b−a)/b


The tricky thing about moving through this problem quickly is --- it involves number-sense, a certain facility with jumping around among the possibilities -- here, shuffling back and forth quickly between positive and negative values.

For example, let a = +/-3, and b = +/-5. We will swap back and forth between positive and negative possibilities as it serves our interests.

In choice (a), if both are positive, then (3/5 - 5/3), small minus big, is negative. Therefore, I could make either a or b negative, and then it would be (-3/5 + 5/3), minus small plus big, which is positive. Be aware of when changing the sign of one or the other or both changes the sign of the answer. Choice (a) is out.

With (b), I notice that if b is positive in the numerator, then -b is negative in the denominator, and if b is negative, then -b is positive. The bigger positive plus or minus the smaller one (a) is still positive. The bigger negative plus or minus the smaller one (a) is still negative. This seems like it's going to be positive/negative or negative/positive no matter how we swap around the signs.

(c) is easy to make positive ===> make b an positive even number and a a negative number ------ negative to an even will be a big positive number, and even to a negative will be a fraction less than one. For example, let's say a = -2 and b = 4

Then a^b−b^a = (-2)^4 - 4^(-2) = 16 - 1/16, which is positive. Choice (c) is out.

For choice (d):
a(b/(a−b)) = (ab)/(a-b)
If both a & b are positive, or if both are negative, then the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. If I make a positive and b negative --- remember, the opposite sign possibility which many test takers will overlook --- then

[(3)*(-5)]/[(3) + (-5)} = (-15)/(-2)

That gives negative/negative, which is positive. Choice (d) is out.

For choice (e):
(b−a)/b
Here if both are positive, a = 3 and b = 5, the answer is positive, so we can eliminate this right away. (e) is out.

It took me more than two minutes to type all that out, but I could see each one of those steps very quickly. The more you develop your number sense ---- which is really what this question is testing --- the more fluent you will be in similar quick manipulations of possible choices.

Does this make sense?

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/