BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

DS Ratio GMATPrep CAT

Expert replies
by myfish » Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:02 pm
This one bothers me.
(1) If the ratio increases (1/2 > 1/4) means both the numerator and the denominator could change, just one more than the other, which is insufficient.
(2) The increased sum does not say what increases, insufficient.
(T) ?? This is where I lose it....

Anyone?
Attachments
DS 21-4.jpg
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:57 pm
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by jcnasia » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:02 am
Si = stocks initial
Sf = stocks final
Bi = bonds initial
Bf = bonds final

The question is: Is Sf > Si?

Statement 1:
Sf / (Sf + Bf) > Si / (Si + Bi)

Let Sf = 1, Bf = 0, Si = 1, and Bi = 1,000,000, then the above statement is true, but Sf = Si.
Let Sf = 2, Bf = 0, Si = 1, and Bi = 1,000,000, then the above statement is true, and Sf > Si.
So, statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement 2:
Sf + Bf > Si + Bi

Let Sf = 1, Bf = 1,000,000, Si = 1, and Bi = 0, then the above statement is true, but Sf = Si.
Let Sf = 2, Bf = 1,000,000, Si = 1, and Bi = 0, then the above statement is true, and Sf > Si
So, statement 2 is insufficient.

Statement 1 and 2:
Sf / (Sf + Bf) > Si / (Si + Bi) => Sf/Si > (Sf + Bf)/(Si + Bi)

Sf + Bf > Si + Bi => (Sf + Bf)/(Si +Bi) > 1

Thus, Sf/Si > 1 which means Sf > Si.

This will hold true for all positive values of Si, Sf, Bi, and Bf, so Statements 1 & 2 are sufficient together.
Join the discussion