BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

percent DS

Expert replies
by PGMAT » Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:05 pm
The percent of an automobile decreased m percent between 2010 and 2011 and then increased n percent between 2011 and 2012. Was the price of the automobile lower in 2010 than in 2012?
1. m < n
2. mn < 100n - 100m

Can some help me with statement 2? I went by plugging numbers, m=10,n=10.1 and m=10, n=16 and end up getting different answers. What am I doing wrong? OA is B
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:08 pm
PGMAT wrote:The percent of an automobile decreased m percent between 2010 and 2011 and then increased n percent between 2011 and 2012. Was the price of the automobile lower in 2010 than in 2012?

1. m < n
2. mn < 100n - 100m
Say, the price was P units in 2010.
Hence, in 2011, the price was P*(1 - m/100)
Now, in 2012, the price is P*(1 - m/100)*(1 + n/100) = P*(1 - m/100 + n/100 - mn/10000) = P + P*(n/100 - m/100 - mn/10000)

Hence, we need to determine whether (n/100 - m/100 - mn/10000) is positive or negative.

Statement 1: We can conclude that (n/100 - m/100) is positive but we don't have any idea about mn/10000.

Not sufficient

Statement 2: As mn < 100n - 100m ---> mn/100 < n - m ---> mn/10000 < n/100 - m/100
Hence, (n/100 - m/100 - mn/10000) > 0

Sufficient

The correct answer is B.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:13 pm
PGMAT wrote:Can some help me with statement 2? I went by plugging numbers, m=10,n=10.1 and m=10, n=16 and end up getting different answers. What am I doing wrong?
The red underlined set of values does not satisfy the condition given in the statement on the first place. So it is not a valid set of numbers.

m = 10 and n = 10.1 --> mn = 101
But, (100n - 100m) = (1010 - 1000) = 10 < 101 = mn
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:04 am
The price of a radio decreased m percent between 2010 and 2011 and then increased n percent between 2011 and 2012. Was the price of the automobile lower in 2010 than in 2012?

1) m<n
2) mn<100(n-m)
Let the original price = 100.
Percent decrease between 2010 and 2011 = (m/100)100 = m.
New price = 100-m.
Percent increase between 2011 and 2012 = (n/100)(100-m) = n - mn/100
Thus, the total percent change = -m + n - mn/100 = n - m - mn/100.

For the price in 2012 to be lower than the price in 2010, the total percent change must be less than 0.
Question rephrased: Is n - m - mn/100 < 0?

Statement 1: m<n
If m=10 and n=20, then n - m - mn/100 = 20 - 10 - 200/100 = 8.
If m=90 and n=100, the n - m - mn/100 = 100 - 90 - 9000/100 = -80.
Since in the first case the total percent change is positive, and in the second case the total percent change is negative, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: mn<100(n-m)
mn/100 < n-m
n - m - mn/100 > 0.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion