BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Co-ordinate + Absolute

Expert replies
by hey_thr67 » Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:03 pm
In which quadrant of the coordinate plane does the point (x, y) lie?

(1) |xy| + x|y| + |x|y + xy > 0
(2) -x < -y < |y|


OA is D

How should I approach absolute questions, I took lot of time to conclude that -y < |y| is only true for y>0. Also what values to put confuses me.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by sam2304 » Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:17 pm
hey_thr67 wrote:In which quadrant of the coordinate plane does the point (x, y) lie?

(1) |xy| + x|y| + |x|y + xy > 0
(2) -x < -y < |y|


OA is D

How should I approach absolute questions, I took lot of time to conclude that -y < |y| is only true for y>0. Also what values to put confuses me.
4 quadrats ++ +- -+ --
1.|xy| + x|y| + |x|y + xy > 0
++ -> easy go satisfies the inequality
+- -> Will result in two -xy and two +xy = 0. Does not satisfy the inequality
-+ -> Same as above
-- -> Middle two will be -xy and end values will +xy, sum = 0

So point lies in Quadrant I. SUFF

(2) -x < -y < |y|

Break the inequality. -y < |y|, this will get satisfied only when y > 0, since -ve values will have both sides equal.
-x < -y => x > y => Multiplied by -1.
Now y > 0, and x > y so both are +ve. SUFF

IMO D.

Inequalities take a lot of time if you substitute values and check. Try approaching with general +ve, -ve values i.e +ve will satisfy this, -ve values will not. I took lot of time to conclude that -y < |y| => Your query about this would also be easier if you had considered +ve or -ve value category of numbers. Test for values < 0, =0 and >0. Nothing more than that is needed. Do not substitute individual values and check. Always remember that when you have 0 in the inequality and no other numbers it tests for +ve -ve values as a whole and substituting individual numbers will slow you down.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:04 pm
hey_thr67 wrote:In which quadrant of the coordinate plane does the point (x, y) lie?

(1) |xy| + x|y| + |x|y + xy > 0
(2) -x < -y < |y|
Statement 1:
--> |xy| + x|y| + |x|y + xy > 0
--> |y|(|x|X + x) + y(|x| + x) > 0
--> (|x| + x)(|y| + y) > 0

Hence, the signs of (|x| + x) and (|y| + y) are same.
Now, if x and y are less than or equal to zero, then |x| = -x and |y| = -y, i.e. (|x| + x) = (|y| + y) = 0

Hence, neither x nor y is negative or zero.
Therefore, both x and y are positive, i.e. (x, y) lies in the first quadrant.

Sufficient

Statement 2: -x < -y < |y|
For y > 0, |y| = y > -y
For y < 0, |y| = -y

Hence, y is positive.

Now, -x < -y ---> x > y
Hence, x is positive too.

Therefore, (x, y) lies in the first quadrant.

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:04 am
hey_thr67 wrote:In which quadrant of the coordinate plane does the point (x, y) lie?

(1) |xy| + x|y| + |x|y + xy > 0
(2) -x < -y < |y|
From 1: If we just mentally create a picture by taking either x negative or y negative or both negative, we see that in all the three cases, two elements are positive and two are negative , all of which can add up to either positive or negative.
hence x and y got to be both positive.

From 2: -x<-y which boils down to x>y. and -y<|y| boils down to y>0. and both thse make x>y>0.

Thus both 1 and 2 are suff.
Hence D.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion