BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Distance from average speed

Expert replies
by Striver » Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:30 am
If it took Carlos ½ hour to cycle from his house to the library yesterday, was the distance that he cycled greater than 6 miles? (Note: 1 mile = 5,280 feet)

(1) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was greater than 16 feet per second.

(2) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was less than 18 feet per second.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:53 am
Striver wrote:If it took Carlos ½ hour to cycle from his house to the library yesterday, was the distance that he cycled greater than 6 miles? (Note: 1 mile = 5,280 feet)

(1) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was greater than 16 feet per second.

(2) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was less than 18 feet per second.
Since the two statements are in terms of FEET PER SECOND, rephrase the question stem in terms of FEET PER SECOND.

1/2 hour = 1800 seconds.
Determine the rate needed to travel 6 miles in 1800 seconds:
(6 miles)/(1800 seconds) * (5280 feet)/(1 mile) = (6*5280)/1800 = 528/30 = 176/10
= 17.6 feet per second.

Thus, to travel MORE than 6 miles in 1800 seconds, the average speed must be GREATER than 17.6 feet per second.
Question rephrased:
Was the average speed greater than 17.6 feet per second?

The two statements combined indicate only that the average speed was between 16 feet per second and 18 feet per second, implying that the average speed could be less than, equal to, or greater than 17.6 feet per second.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by khandelwal.ab » Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:29 am
I spent about three minutes to get to the answer here. However if I had rephrased the stem as Mitch did, I would have spent less then a minute.

A perfect question that made me realise that you should ALWAYS rephrase the stem.
Join the discussion

by gmattesttaker2 » Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:46 pm
Hello Mitch,

Had a question. I was wondering why we are calculating the rate here.

Will the following be correct here: Speed = Distance/Time. I was trying this approach:

16 ft. = Distance/1800 sec

and once I found Distance I wanted to compare whether it was greater than 6 miles.

Sorry I am not too good with some of these problems. Thanks a lot for your help.

Regards,
Sri
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:11 am
Striver wrote:If it took Carlos ½ hour to cycle from his house to the library yesterday, was the distance that he cycled greater than 6 miles? (Note: 1 mile = 5,280 feet)

(1) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was greater than 16 feet per second.

(2) The average speed at which Carlos cycled from his house to the library yesterday was less than 18 feet per second.
Distance = speed*time.
Distance = speed*.5 hours.
Thus s/2=d>6
or s>12 miles/hour is the question in simplified form.
from 1:s>16ft/sec.
Convert it to miles/hour.
16*(1/5280miles)/(1/3600hours)
16*(3600/5280) = 10.9 Miles/hour.
Insufficient.

From 2:
s<18ft/sec
converting to miles/hour = 18*(3600/5280)=12.27
Insufficient.

Combining 1 and 2 we get that
10.9<s<12.27.
Insuff.
hence correct answer is E.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by gmattesttaker2 » Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:53 pm
Hello Dhonu,

Hope all is well. Thank you very much for your kind reply and for your thorough explanation. Now it is clear. Thanks again.

Best Regards,
Sri
Join the discussion