BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Vemuri's Brain Teaser-5

Expert replies
by mathbyvemuri » Thu May 31, 2012 9:45 pm
In tennis, service alternates for each game between the two players and the first player to win 6 games wins. A player winning 6-2 indicates that 8 games were played, of which the winning player won 6 and loosing player won 2.
Rafa beat roger in a set of tennis, winning 6 games to Roger's three. Five games were won by the player who did not serve. Who served first?
(1)Rafa (2) Roger (3) Inconsistent (4) Indeterminate
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by eagleeye » Thu May 31, 2012 10:39 pm
It is Rafa serving first. .

Let Rafa be A, and Roger be O (I am choosing the second letters for each player's name).

Then we have 6 wins for A, and 3 wins for O. Since the games went till 9 games, the last game must have been won by A. Also, we are given that 5 wins came for the players while they weren't serving. Then, by standard Tennis rules, the serves must alternate. So we can have only two possibilities (other than the data being inconsistent) for the order of the serves:

Either A/O/A/O/A/O/A/O/A
Or O/A/O/A/O/A/O/A/O

Now we know that the last game must have been won by A (Otherwise the match would have ended at game 8, so we really don't care about the last one). Now for the rest, let's consider matching the winner/loser data with the options. I am going to represent A winning by a, and O winning by o.

Then: For the first possibility of Serves, we have one possibility that:
Game: 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9
Wins: a/a/o/a/o/a/a/o/a
Serves: A/O/A/O/A/O/A/O/A

In this case, data is consistent since we have 3 wins for O, 5 wins when the players are not serving (Note the wins vs serves rows and compare columns for 2/3/4/5/6) and total 6 wins for A.

Now let's consider the other possibility of Serves:
Game: 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9
Wins: o/a/a/a/o/o/a/a/a
Serves: O/A/O/A/O/A/O/A/O

In this case, data will not fit because the last column of wins vs serves has opposite elements. Since we can have only 5 games where players serving did not win, this means that of the other 8 games, 4 columns have to have opposite letters in wins vs games. So, we would have 2 o, 2a. But having it this way would mean that for the other 4 games, because the players serving must win, we have 2 more o, and 2 more a. This is inconsistent with our original condition of 6a, 3o. Hence this cannot be the case. Consequently, the correct answer is 1.

Let me know if this helps and if I got it right :)
Join the discussion

by mathbyvemuri » Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:33 am
eagleeye wrote:It is Rafa serving first. .

Let me know if this helps and if I got it right :)
hats off,you are right.
Join the discussion