-
fangtray
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:50 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
Radio stations with radio data system (RDS) technology broadcast special program information that only radios with an RDS feature can receive. Between 1994 and 1996, the number of RDS radio stations in Verdland increased from 250 to 600. However, since the number of RDS-equipped radios in Verdland was about the same in 1996 as in 1994, the number of Verdlanders receiving the special program information probably did not increase significantly.
a. Few if any of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcast to people with RDS-equipped radios living in areas not previously reached by RDS stations.
b. In 1996, Verdlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS could not receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.
Please evaluate my thought process for negating these 2 statements to see if the argument is weakened.
a. If many of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcasted to people with RDS radios living in areas that previously could not be reached by RDS stations, then the 350 increase in number of radio stations correlates to an increase in listeners.
b. 1996, if Vernlanders who did not own RDS radios COULD receive broadcasting from the RDS radio stations, then the increase of 350 radio stations without the increase in RDS radios correlates to an increase in listeners.
both negatation works! where am i going wrong?
a. Few if any of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcast to people with RDS-equipped radios living in areas not previously reached by RDS stations.
b. In 1996, Verdlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS could not receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.
Please evaluate my thought process for negating these 2 statements to see if the argument is weakened.
a. If many of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcasted to people with RDS radios living in areas that previously could not be reached by RDS stations, then the 350 increase in number of radio stations correlates to an increase in listeners.
b. 1996, if Vernlanders who did not own RDS radios COULD receive broadcasting from the RDS radio stations, then the increase of 350 radio stations without the increase in RDS radios correlates to an increase in listeners.
both negatation works! where am i going wrong?
