n+1 > 0. thus n > -1. so n= {0,1,2,3,4,5.......} ( n is an integer ).
np > 0 thus both n and p have to be greater than zero because the other possibility where n and p both < 0 but earlier condition doesnt allows that. Thus n and p > 0. Conclusion through both the startements hence correct answer C.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
GMAT prep question, thanks : )
Source: Beat The GMAT — Problem Solving |
Statement (1) talks about 'n' and not about 'p', so it's useless.
Statement (2) can be true when both n > 0 and p > 0, OR when n < 0 and p < 0. So, 'p' can hold any value and this statement is also useless.
Let's try to combine them.
The first statement says that n > -1 and n is an integer. So, n is an integer >= 0.
When we combine this with the second statement, we see that 'n' can't be 0 because 'np' can't be 0. Now, since n > 0 and np > 0, 'p' has to be > 0.
That answers the question with a YES, and therefore [C] is the answer.
Statement (2) can be true when both n > 0 and p > 0, OR when n < 0 and p < 0. So, 'p' can hold any value and this statement is also useless.
Let's try to combine them.
The first statement says that n > -1 and n is an integer. So, n is an integer >= 0.
When we combine this with the second statement, we see that 'n' can't be 0 because 'np' can't be 0. Now, since n > 0 and np > 0, 'p' has to be > 0.
That answers the question with a YES, and therefore [C] is the answer.












