BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

LAWYER

Expert replies
by pappueshwar » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:52 am
The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the police of having illegally taped her confidential conversations with her client and then used the information obtained to find evidence supporting their murder charges.

HOW TO SOLVE THESE KIND OF PROBLEMS ?


A used the information obtained to find evidence supporting
B used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting
C used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
D of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
E of using such information as they obtained to find evidence that would be supportive of
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GmatKiss » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:33 am
pappueshwar wrote:The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the police of having illegally taped her confidential conversations with her client and then used the information obtained to find evidence supporting their murder charges.

HOW TO SOLVE THESE KIND OF PROBLEMS ?


A used the information obtained to find evidence supporting - out
B used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting - out
C used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support - out
D of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
E of using such information as they obtained to find evidence that would be supportive of
Only D and E are parallel, Choose D
Join the discussion

by mankey » Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:32 am
D looks good but not sure, what "they" refers to in D. Police??

Request experts to help.

Regards.
Join the discussion

by ansh.kumar » Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:29 am
hi,
can,t the taped be parallel to used.
kindly reply
thanks
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:58 am
pappueshwar wrote:The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the police of having illegally taped her confidential conversations with her client and then used the information obtained to find evidence supporting their murder charges.

HOW TO SOLVE THESE KIND OF PROBLEMS ?


A used the information obtained to find evidence supporting
B used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting
C used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
D of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
E of using such information as they obtained to find evidence that would be supportive of
D is best.
"of having" is parallel to "of using".
In non underlined part "their" is used for police so "they" is correct for "police".
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:28 am
pappueshwar wrote:The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the police of having illegally taped her confidential conversations with her client and then used the information obtained to find evidence supporting their murder charges.

HOW TO SOLVE THESE KIND OF PROBLEMS ?


A used the information obtained to find evidence supporting
B used such information as they obtained to find evidence supporting
C used the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
D of using the information they had obtained to find evidence that would support
E of using such information as they obtained to find evidence that would be supportive of
I received a PM asking me to comment.

In A, B and C, a reader might think that the LAWYER charged and then USED the information. Since the intended meaning is that the POLICE used the information, eliminate A, B and C.

In E, such information as they obtained is unidiomatic. Eliminate E.

D is better than the rest, but I would ignore this SC.
In the non-underlined portion, charged that she suspected is awkward and feels a bit redundant: why not simply say she ACCUSED?
In D, the change from the present perfect (HAVING taped, which implies PRIOR action) to the present (USING the information, which implies CONTEMPORANEOUS action) is confusing. Were the police USING the information at the same time as the lawyer CHARGED? The sequence of events is hard to follow.
I'm not even sure that the GMAT would approve of the idiom suspected X of VERBing. The following is more likely: The lawyer suspected that the police HAD illegally taped her conversations.

What is the source of this SC?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1