BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

question about plugging in numbers

Expert replies
by wawatan » Thu May 22, 2008 9:53 pm
if in the question, it has variable x and y

could you put the same number for x and y?

for example can we say x=4 y=4 ....any suggestions? i'm having trouble plugging number for data sufficiency problems with number properties....


:?:
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by VP_Jim » Thu May 22, 2008 9:58 pm
In problem solving, it's generally a bad idea to use the same number for multiple variables. Also, it's generally a bad idea to use 0 or 1, or any number that appears in the answer choices. This is because 0 and 1 have different properties than other numbers, and funny things can happen when they are used (and, when you use the same number for both variables and end up dividing x by y, you end up with 1).

Data sufficiency is the opposite: you *want* to use the numbers with the funny properties. So, go ahead and use 0 or 1, or the same numbers, or extreme numbers, or positives and negatives and fractions. Go nuts!

Hope this helps!
Jim S. | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

Re: question about plugging in numbers

by lunarpower » Sat May 24, 2008 1:35 am
wawatan wrote:if in the question, it has variable x and y

could you put the same number for x and y?

for example can we say x=4 y=4 ....any suggestions? i'm having trouble plugging number for data sufficiency problems with number properties....

:?:
if you're doing a data sufficiency problem, the issue is to recognize the TYPES OF NUMBERS that are ASSOCIATED with each operation that you're going to deal with.

for instance:
if you see ABSOLUTE VALUE in a data sufficiency problem, then you should know right away that the problem will revolve around whether the numbers in the problem are POSITIVE, NEGATIVE, or ZERO.

if you see COMPARISONS BETWEEN POWERS of the same variable - for instance, x^2 < x - in a data sufficiency problem, then you should know that positive/negative/zero matters, but also that GREATER / LESS THAN 1 (and also -1) matters as well. this is the case because powers of 'normal' numbers (like 2 and 3) are bigger than the numbers themselves, but powers of fractions (between 0 and 1) are smaller than the original numbers.

etc.

once you get the gist of it, you'll have an idea what sort of numbers to plug in.

--

as the post above says, you might want to shy away from picking the same # for two or more variables ON PROBLEM SOLVING PROBLEMS. however, if you're solving a data sufficiency problem, you may well want to plug in the same number for the two different variables just to see what happens; on certain number properties problems, that may be the exception that disproves the rule. for instance, here's a relatively simple problem that i just made up:
is (x - y)^2 positive?
(1) blah blah
(2) blah blah blah

in this case, the only way (x - y)^2 can't be positive is if x = y, so, if you avoid plugging in equal numbers wholesale, you might wrongly conclude that a statement is sufficient when it actually isn't.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion