positive integers - mulitple

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:49 am
Thanked: 1 times

positive integers - mulitple

by maria » Wed May 21, 2008 7:00 am
if a and b are positive integers, is a a multiple of b?
1, every prime factor of b is also a prime factor of a.
2, every factor of b is also a factor of a.

Great thanks.
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by punit.kaur.mba » Wed May 21, 2008 7:23 am
According to me, answer should be (B)

Explaination -

Any number (positive integer) can be expressed as a product of its prime factors alone.

Eg:- b= 24, a =12

b as product of primes = 2 x 2 x 2 x3

Prime factors of b are 2 & 3

Now a as product of primes

a= 2 x 2 x 3

Prime factors of a are 2 & 3

Stmt1:- Every prime factor of b is also a prime factor of a.

According to the above example every prime factor of b is a prime factor of a. but A is not multiple of b.Another case, if a was 48, Stmt1 is true, but a is a multiple of b.

Since Stmt1 does not give a definite answer, Stmt1 alone is insufficient to answer the question

choices narrowed to B,C,E

Stmt2:- Every factor of b is a factor of a
Eg:- b = 24 a =72

factors of b = 1,2,3,4,6,12,8,24
factors of a = 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,12,18,24,72

Every factor of b is a factor of a.

For any pair of a and b values satisfying Stmt2 will give the answer as a being a multiple of b, hence it gives a unique answer.

Stmt2 alone is sufficient and Stmt1 alone is not.

Ans is (B)

What is OA?

Someone correct me if I am wrong.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 10:11 pm

by rattanas » Wed May 21, 2008 7:26 am
The answer should be that all factors of b are all facors of a..but only the prime factors are not enough

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 11:49 am
Thanked: 1 times

by maria » Wed May 21, 2008 7:45 am
Dear punit.kaur.mba,

you are correct. OA is B.

It seems a long approach to get it. I am usually scared of problems related to integers and multiple like this. Can you pls show me how to get familiar?

Million thanks.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:44 pm
Thanked: 8 times

by punit.kaur.mba » Wed May 21, 2008 7:53 am
Hey Maria,

My explaination seems longer. But the concept is the same...

When problems like this come up, its always good to first go with the answer the problem suggests. For eg: try to take smaller exampels that satisfy what the question states


Then, instead of jumping to mark answer, Think critically and try to find a contradicting example (for instance the one where even though prime factors were same, a is not multiple of b).

that way you will get the right answer.

I am not sure how you attempted to solve this question. May be an instructors advice on how to sovle such questions could help you better ...

Legendary Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:57 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by netigen » Wed May 21, 2008 11:01 am
Ans is B

(B) every factor B includes B itself so it means B is a factor of A hence sufficient
(A) hold true for

a=21 (3 x 7)
b=63 (3 x 7 x 3)

or switch a and b

b=21 (3 x 7)
a=63 (3 x 7 x 3)


so insufficient