Antarctica has not always been the ice

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members
Antarctica has not always been the ice covered desert it is today. More than 170 million years ago, Antarctica was part of the supercontinent Gondwana, which had a mild climate. Over time, Gondwana gradually broke apart, and Antarctica as we know it today was formed around 25 million years ago. Initially, West Antarctica was partially in the Northern Hemisphere whereas East Antarctica was at the equator, where sea floor invertebrates and trilobites flourished in the tropical seas. At the end of the Devonian period, 360 million years ago, Gondwana became centered around the South Pole and its climate cooled, though flora remained. Towards the end of the Permian period, continued warming led to a dry, hot climate over much of Gondwana. As a result of continued warming, the polar ice caps melted and much of Gondwana became a desert.

The breakup of Gondwana was a very slow and gradual process, lasting millions of years and correlating with climatic changes. Africa was the first continent that separated from Antarctica around 160 million years ago, followed by the Indian subcontinent, in the early Cretaceous period, about 125 million years ago. About 65 million years ago, Antarctica, then still connected to Australia, still had a tropical to subtropical climate. About 40 million years ago Australia-New Guinea separated from Antarctica, and the first ice began to appear. Around 23 million years ago, the Drake Passage opened between Antarctica and South America, which resulted in the Antarctic Circumpolar. The ice spread, replacing the forests that then covered the continent. Since about 15 million years ago, the continent has been mostly covered with ice, with the Antarctic ice cap reaching its present extension around 6 million years ago.


The primary purpose of the passage is to
A) review the desertification and icing of Antarctica in light of the continental spread
B) depict the gradual disintegration of the Gondwana supercontinent
C) show how Antarctica reached its current location
D) explain the geological changes that occured in Earth's continents over history
E) elaborate on the climactic changes that affected trees in Antarctica

OA - A
Last edited by patanjali.purpose on Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:00 pm
IMO : D

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:11 am
@Avik: Can you explain your stand behind D, why other options are wrong ?

IMO A.

B - Both the paragraphs speaks more about antartica than about Gondwana.

C/E - can be eliminated directly as the passage does not speak about the climatic changes that affected trees or how it reached to current position.

D - This option seems too generic as the passage speaks about Gondwana alone and not about other continents.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:57 am

by bharti06 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:53 am
confused between A and C?

C looks a contender to me because the first passages begins by saying that"Antarctica has not been this way since beginning" and then goes to explain as to how Antarctica reached in the position it is today....

OA and OE please.....

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:21 am
sam2304 wrote:@Avik: Can you explain your stand behind D, why other options are wrong ?
I understand and fully agree with you that D is too generic but rest are equally bad.

Can you justify the verb - "review" in A. Review is something like -- a review of a book/incident/movie. Where the author go through the whole book/incident/movie - summarize it, gives his/her viewpoint. Here the author is doing none.

Anyway, What is the OA ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:43 am
Review again on the other hand means revisiting something and it fits here.

Excerpt from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/review
re·view (r-vy)
v. re·viewed, re·view·ing, re·views
v.tr.
1. To look over, study, or examine again.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:11 am
Thanked: 2 times

by sai.99.gmat » Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:32 am
IMO A,

Review seems more appropriate (from POE)

B) Incorrect --> passage stressed on antartica
C) Incorrect --> doesnt relate on locations specifically
D) Incorrect --> Stressed more on antartica and factors surroundings its evolution from SuperContinent,

E) Too specific, nothing mentioned about trees

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:10 members

by ronnie1985 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:00 pm
(A) is the answer in my opinion.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:02 pm
sam2304 wrote:Review again on the other hand means revisiting something and it fits here.

Excerpt from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/review
re·view (r-vy)
v. re·viewed, re·view·ing, re·views
v.tr.
1. To look over, study, or examine again.
Good one !! Thanks for sharing the information.