GMAT Practice Test 1 - DS Geometry Problem

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:12 pm
Each stmt by itself is not sufficient, but if you put the two stmts together you get that you have 2 isosceles triangles: QRS and STU. This is why you will get two equations:
a. RSQ = (180 - QRS)/2, since RQS = RSQ
b. UST = (180 - STU)/2, since UST = SUT
Now, remember that you've got a right triangle, with RPT a right angle. This means that PRT + PTR = 180 - RPT = 90. But PRT is the same as QRS and PTR is the same as STU. You must also notice that:

x = 180 - RSQ - UST

Replace RSQ and UST and you get that:

x = 180 - (180 - PRT)/2 - (180 - PTR)/2 = 180 - [360 - (PRT + PTR)]/2 = 180 - (360 - 90)/2 = 180 - 270/2 = 180 - 135 = 45.

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Phillips Ranch, CA

by nicandalf » Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:49 pm
DanaJ, thank you so much, your explanation was perfect. I was a little unsure with my approach, but I can see the solution clearly now.
~ Nikki ~

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 2:58 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by mathlete1 » Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:33 am
DanaJ wrote:Each stmt by itself is not sufficient, but if you put the two stmts together you get that you have 2 isosceles triangles: QRS and STU. This is why you will get two equations:
a. RSQ = (180 - QRS)/2, since RQS = RSQ
b. UST = (180 - STU)/2, since UST = SUT
Now, remember that you've got a right triangle, with RPT a right angle. This means that PRT + PTR = 180 - RPT = 90. But PRT is the same as QRS and PTR is the same as STU. You must also notice that:

x = 180 - RSQ - UST

Replace RSQ and UST and you get that:

x = 180 - (180 - PRT)/2 - (180 - PTR)/2 = 180 - [360 - (PRT + PTR)]/2 = 180 - (360 - 90)/2 = 180 - 270/2 = 180 - 135 = 45.
DanaJ,

I'm having trouble with this one still. Why do you make a distinction between RSQ and QRS? or between UST and STU in the first part? Furthermore, why are you dividing by 2? Can you explain why you do this? Thank you

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:19 pm
I posted an alternate approach here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-ds ... 78673.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:44 am
The thing is, with angles it matters what's in the middle of the three letters. For instance, RSQ has the point at S, while QRS has the point at R. Those are two completely different angles. It's the same with UST and STU: one has the point at S, while the other has the point of the angle at T.

As to why I'm dividing by 2: the triangle QRS is isosceles, since it has two sides that have the same length. This means that angles RQS and RSQ are are equal. In any given triangle, the sum of angles is always 180 degrees, which means that you have the following relationship:

RQS + RSQ + QRS = 180

But the first two are equal, so:

2RSQ + QRS = 180

so in the end:

2RSQ = 180 - QRS

RSQ = (180 - QRS)/2

Hope this helps!