I must say that I am quite impressed with those who have been able to keep up with the blistering pace of the 60 day plan.
I've been working through the Manhattan Guides as quickly as possible, while carefully working the problems, tracking results, and analyzing my answer choices vis-a-vis the OG. It would appear that I would need to sacrifice quality of analysis and practice to keep up with the pace of the 60 day plan. Furthermore, there are some advanced topics in the Manhattan program that are skipped all together in the 60 day plan.
I'd be interested in thoughts / recommendations from those who have found the pace challenging, and have successfully reconciled the (potential) pace versus thoughtful analysis conflict.
Oh, it would probably be worth noting that my target GMAT score is 750, from a pre-study diagnostic score of 590.
Thanks in advance!
I've been working through the Manhattan Guides as quickly as possible, while carefully working the problems, tracking results, and analyzing my answer choices vis-a-vis the OG. It would appear that I would need to sacrifice quality of analysis and practice to keep up with the pace of the 60 day plan. Furthermore, there are some advanced topics in the Manhattan program that are skipped all together in the 60 day plan.
I'd be interested in thoughts / recommendations from those who have found the pace challenging, and have successfully reconciled the (potential) pace versus thoughtful analysis conflict.
Oh, it would probably be worth noting that my target GMAT score is 750, from a pre-study diagnostic score of 590.
Thanks in advance!
