Difficult CR - conflicting options

[vikram4689]

The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's prescription for obtaining hypodermic needles is to lower the incidence of drug-related deaths, both accidental and intentional, involving hypodermic needles. But even knitting needles can be lethal if they fall into the wrong hands; yet everyone would agree that imposing legal restrictions on obtaining knitting needles would be preposterous. Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted.

Which of the following, it true, would provide most support for the argument above?

(A) Knitting needles have been known to cause injury and death.
(B) The benefits of hypodermic needles outweigh those of knitting needles.
(C) The proposed law would not deter the sort of activity known to result in drug-related deaths.
(D) The proposed law could not be effectively enforced.
(E) Knitting needles are not readily available to anybody who wants to obtain them.

[spoiler]Confused b/w A & C[/spoiler]
@David can you please explain this

[vikram4689]

Confused b/w A & C
C - since proposed law would not deter the activities as knitting needles, which are lethal, are available to whosoever wants to carry such activities, so law should not be enacted. Hence this should be correct.

A - Since knitting needles have been known to cause death, enacting law on hypodermic needles only would not help. Hence this should be correct.