BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP:Good question on Inequalities

Expert replies
by zaarathelab » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:49 am
1. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?

(1) c > a
(2) abc > c

2. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?
(1) c > a
(2) abc > 0

Experts, what is the shortest possible to solve the above? I took 4 minutes on the first one, especially because of the 2nd statement.
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cans » Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:42 am
first one IMO A?
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by 4GMAT_Mumbai » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:19 am
zaarathelab wrote:1. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?

(1) c > a
(2) abc > c

Experts, what is the shortest possible to solve the above? I took 4 minutes on the first one, especially because of the 2nd statement.
The question boils down to finding out whether c > 0 or c <= 0. In my opinion, the best way would be to prove that the statement holds true in both the cases; prove insufficiency and move on. It may not make sense to prove using inequality fundaes in a situation like this.

For eg.

Let a = 0.5, b = 1 and c = -1000

Here, abc > c while c is a -ve number

Let a = 3, b = 4 and c = +1000

Here, abc > c while c is a +ve number.

Hence, 2nd statement is insufficient by itself.

I hope this helps. Thanks.
Naveenan Ramachandran
4GMAT, Dadar(W) & Ghatkopar(W), Mumbai
Join the discussion

by n@resh » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:49 am
cans wrote:first one IMO A?
1. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?

from (1) c > a: let a = -3, b = -2, and c = -1 ; => -2-1 > -3 (FALSE)
let a = 4, C = 5, and b = 6; => 11> 4 ( True)
i think it's not sufficient!

from (2), it's not sufficient as well! ( already proved by @4GMAT_Mumbai)

Using both the statements 1 and 2, we have c>a and abc>C

i.e. Let a = -4, b = 3, c = -1 ; => 2 > -4 ( True)
one more case: a = -4, b = -3, c = 1 ; => -2 > -4 ( True)
Let a = 3, b = 4 and c = +1000 ; => 1004 > 3 (True)

Hence Answer : C!
Join the discussion

by parul9 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:58 am
what abt the second qsn?
Is it A for that?
Join the discussion

by n@resh » Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:27 am
parul9 wrote:what abt the second qsn?
Is it A for that?
i think even it's C!

from 2nd stmt: abc>0, a = -3, b= -2, c = 4 ; => -2+4 > -3 ( True)
a = 8, b = 10, c = 4; => 10 +4 > 8 ( True)
a = -8, b = 10, c = -20; => 10-20 > -8 ( False)

Not sufficient!

Using both the statements 1 and 2, we have c>a and abc>0

i.e. Let a = -4, b = 3, c = -1 ; => 2 > -4 ( True)
one more case: a = -4, b = -3, c = 1 ; => -2 > -4 ( True)
Let a = 3, b = 4 and c = +1000 ; => 1004 > 3 (True)

Hence Answer : C
Join the discussion

by thermcin » Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:06 pm
4GMAT_Mumbai wrote:
For eg.

Let a = 0.5, b = 1 and c = -1000
There is a problem with the number selection here - the variable 'a' cannot be 0.5 because it is an integer. But your overall approach is good..
Join the discussion

by studentps2011 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:52 am
Can an expert please explain how this can be solved algebraically or within 2 mins? Thanks
Join the discussion

by rijul007 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:04 am
zaarathelab wrote:2. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?
(1) c > a
(2) abc > 0
Given:
b>a

Ques:
Is b+c>a

Statement 1: c > a

True when all are positve
but might not be true if all are negative

This statement is not sufficient

Statement 2: abc > 0

This means either two of the variables are negative or none of them are negative.
Case 1 [none of the variables negative]
b > a
c => 0

b+c > a [value of c does not matter as long as it is non negative]

Case 2 [two of the vaeiables are negative]
a and b are negative , c is positve
a+b > c

b and c cannot be negative as b has to be greater than a

a and c are negative , b is positive
here if |c| > b-a,
b+c < a

if |c| < b-a
b+c > a

if |c| = b-a
b+c = a

Therefore Statement 2 alone is not suffiicient

Combining statement 1 and 2
c > a

if a and c are negative and b is positve
|c| < b-a [because c is greater than a]
hence b+c > a

|c| != b-a [!= means not equal to]

and all three can never be negative

Hence, sol can be found using both the statements
C is the correct option
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:26 am
1) E
2) C
zaarathelab wrote:1. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?

(1) c > a
(2) abc > c

2. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?
(1) c > a
(2) abc > 0

Experts, what is the shortest possible to solve the above? I took 4 minutes on the first one, especially because of the 2nd statement.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:27 am
IMO: A for both.

What is the OA?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by dabral » Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:38 pm
This is a hard question, here is one explanation.

Statement 1 Alone: Given b>a and c>a, add the two inequalities, this means b+c>2a, now we need to determine if b+c>a?. If a is positive, then 2a is to the right of a on the number line, and b+c>a(Yes). However, if a is negative, then 2a is to the left of a and b+c could be less than a.

If the above approach is not clear then consider the following examples:
a = 5, b = 7, c = 9, these values satisfy b>a and c>a, and the answer to the question is b+c>a, is a Yes.
a = -4, b = -2, c = -3, these values again satisfy b>a, and c>a, however the answer to the question b+c>a, is now No.
Therefore, Insufficient.

Statement 2 Alone: abc>c, rewrite abc-c>0, factor c, c(ab-1)>0.
Reuse the first example above:
a = 5, b = 7, c = 9, these values satisfy statement 2 and b>a, the answer to the question is b+c>a is Yes.
Now change the numbers to c=-8, a = -3, and b=2, we do satisfy statement 2, -8[(-3)(2)-1] = 56>0, and b>a, however, b+c=-6 which is less than a=-3. Answer to the question is No.
Insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 Together: c(ab-1)>0 and b>a and c>a.
Case 1: If a>0, then both b and c are positive because b>a and c>a. Under this scenario we also satisfy c(ab-1)>0. Just as we did in Statment 1 adding b>a and c>a yields b+c>2a, and because 2a is to the right of a(a is positive here), therefore b+c must be greater than a. This is a definite Yes scenario.
Case 2: If a<0, then either c>0 and b<0 or c<0 and b>0, to satisfy c(ab-1)>0. In both scenarios b and c are to the right of a on the number line, because b>a and c>a, and the answer to the question is b+c>a, will always be Yes. Writing the two cases on the number line makes it easier to visualize:
a<0, c>0, and b<0
--------a-------b------0--------c-------
Here b+c>a, because adding a positive number(c) to a number b that is already greater than a.
a<0, c<0, and b>0
-------a------c------0------b----------
Again, b+c>a, because adding a positive number(b) to a number c that is already greater than a.

Therefore 1 and 2 together are sufficient, and answer is C. Might be better if I made a video.

Dabral
zaarathelab wrote:1. If a, b, c are integers such that b > a, is b + c > a?

(1) c > a
(2) abc > c

Experts, what is the shortest possible to solve the above? I took 4 minutes on the first one, especially because of the 2nd statement.
Free Video Explanations: 2021 GMAT OFFICIAL GUIDE.
Join the discussion