BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

expressed

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:59 am
Statement (2) is obviously not sufficient.

Statement (1) Instead of doing algebra, substitute y = -2/x in the equation.

You get 6. Hence the expression is correct. Sufficient. AIMO
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:11 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, could y be expressed as -2/x?

(1) x^2y^2 - xy = 6

(2) y ≠ 3/x

OA A
Hi jainrahul1985!

This is a tricky little quadratic problem but it looks like the OA is actually incorrect so I'm very glad you PM'd me about it! Can you post the original source and also check to verify that the OA of A is correct - it should be C.

Let's start the same way we should begin every DS problem, by rephrasing the question into something we can work with!

First, we are told that xy ≠ 0, so that means neither x nor y = 0! This is good to know. Now, the question asks:

Does y = -2/x?
Well, let's multiply both sides by x to get that variable out of the denominator:

Does xy = -2?

This is a bit easier to ask, so I think we have sufficiently rephrased. Now on to the statements.

**Statement (1): x^2y^2 - xy = 6
Notice that we have squared variables and non-squared variables, so we should immediately begin to think about quadratics (problems with x^2 and x typically). To solve quadratics, we typically want to have everything set =0, so let's start there:

x^2y^2 - xy - 6 = 0

Now, the un-squared "middle" term contains BOTH an x and a y. So let's lump the first term x and y together. Since the exponents on the x and y are the same, we can actually do the multiplication first (x^2y^2 = (xy)^2):

(xy)^2 - xy - 6 = 0

Now this is starting to look a lot more like a typical quadratic, but instead of a simple x^2 or z^2 or whatever, we have a combo term (xy)^2. To make this easier to see, let's use a little substitution magic and simply call xy = z. Now we can rewrite:

z^2 - z - 6 = 0

Well this looks a lot easier to factor:

(z-3)(z+2) = 0
z = 3, or z = -2.

And since we said that z=xy, then
xy=3, or xy=-2.

But this is not enough to say that xy=-2 (because it could also equal 3), Insufficient, Eliminate A and D from the choices

**Statement (2): y ≠ 3/x
From this, all we know is that the product xy≠3, but this is not enough to say that it does = -2, Insufficient, Elminate Choice B

**Statement (1+2):
From (1) we know that xy could equal either 3 or -2, but from (2) we know that it cannot equal 3, so it must =-2. Sufficient, the correct choice is C

Hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:17 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, could y be expressed as -2/x?

(1) x^2y^2 - xy = 6

(2) y ≠ 3/x

OA A

I don't think this could ever be a GMAT question - too many problems with the word "could."

Even without using any of the statements, it's possible that y = -2/x

Analogous example: Juan is thinking of an integer between 1 and 10. Could the integer be 7? Sure!

I believe the intent of the question was to have students take x^2y^2 - xy = 6 and set it equal to zero (x^2y^2 - xy - 6 = 0) and then factor it to get (xy-3)(xy+2)=0, with the idea that xy+2 could equal zero, in which case y = -2/x. However, xy+2 could equal zero WITHOUT using statement 2.

I think it might be best to disregard this question.

What's the source?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:18 am
Whitney, I completely agree with your solution.

But the question just asks you if y can be expressed as -2/x.

Even if x*y has 2 values, it can be expressed as -2/x.

Hence won't it be sufficient to just check if satisfies the condition or not? Pls correct me if I am wrong here.

Thanks,
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:32 am
Aside: all DS questions are impossible to answer without using the statements.

For example: If ABC is a triangle, is the area of ABC = 12?
Well, maybe the area equals 12 and maybe it doesn't. We need more info.

Alternatively, consider the question: If ABC is a triangle, could the area of ABC = 12?
There's nothing in the given information that would suggest that the area cannot equal 12. So, at this point (without even looking at any statements), it seems reasonable to conclude that the area could equal 12.

The same applies to the original question.

Now if the target question were"does y = -2/x," then I'd agree with Whitney and say that the answer is C.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:36 am
Haha! I get it Brent.
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:37 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
jainrahul1985 wrote:If xy ≠ 0, could y be expressed as -2/x?

(1) x^2y^2 - xy = 6

(2) y ≠ 3/x

OA A

I don't think this could ever be a GMAT question - too many problems with the word "could."
Completely Agree Brent! A search of all 12th Ed OG problems and 2nd Ed Quant Supplement problems and NO DS problems use the word "could" in this context. I second my request for the original source.

:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion

by saketk » Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:32 am
I was about to write what Brent has written then read the posts. I was simply going to write 'Yes' as my answer :)

PS: I think I read a similar question posted in BTG sometime back, which had 'could' in it...
Join the discussion