Kaplan challenge problem!

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

Kaplan challenge problem!

by GmatKiss » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:54 am
For a certain exam, was the standard deviation of the scores for students U, V, W, X, Y and Z less than the standard deviation of the scores for students A, B and C?

(1) The standard deviation of the scores of students U, V, and W was less than the standard deviation of the scores of students A, B and C on the exam.

(2) The standard deviation of the scores of students X, Y and Z was less than the standard deviation of the scores of students A, B and C on the exam.

IMO: E
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Thanked: 236 times
Followed by:54 members
GMAT Score:770

by GmatMathPro » Sat Oct 15, 2011 8:35 pm
Edit: Removed due to crappiness of solution.
Last edited by GmatMathPro on Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:57 pm
why is that?
from the very beginning we must assume that the data (U,V,W,X,Y,Z) is not distributed abnormally here. We must assume that the samples selected are also samples within the arrayed (ascending or descending) interval for the mean of population of two samples to be equal to the mean of sampling distribution, otherwise the solution offered below is devoid of any sense.

next to assuming so many parametric factors about central tendency, we must assume also that the population with which we compare two samples - the population of A,B,C is also not abnormally distributed!

this question is total mess :( what's the source?

GmatMathPro wrote: Statements 1&2. F/3<E/3 and G/3<E/3 implies that (F+G)/3<2E/3 (adding the inequalities). But F+G=D, so making a substitution gives:
D/3<2E/3

dividing both sides by 2 gives

D/6<E/3

taking the square root of both sides gives

√(D/6)<√{E/3)

This is the statement we were trying to prove, so sufficient.

Ans: C
Success doesn't come overnight!