-
sunilrawat
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:20 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- GMAT Score:640
Hi,
I read about a shortcut method for solving areas in GMAT questions.
The method said that whenever the figures are NOT mentioned as "figure not drawn to scale" we can actually assume the figures to be scaled.
For example, in this figure, the shaded area (according to the method) would be approximately 3 times of the smaller triangle (because it seems so). I even got the answer right, by this method.
Is this always true on GMAT?

[/img]
I read about a shortcut method for solving areas in GMAT questions.
The method said that whenever the figures are NOT mentioned as "figure not drawn to scale" we can actually assume the figures to be scaled.
For example, in this figure, the shaded area (according to the method) would be approximately 3 times of the smaller triangle (because it seems so). I even got the answer right, by this method.
Is this always true on GMAT?

[/img]












