BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Bold faced CR

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:38 am
Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.

B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.

C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.

D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by navami » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:27 am
IMO D.
first part is a conclusion. 2nd part is also a conclusion.

only option D makes sense.
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

by saketk » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:22 am
IMO option D

Reason: - it is evident that there are two contrasting conclusion present here.. the first one is an intermediate conclusion and the final i.e. the latter conclusion call the intermediate conclusion by providing an alternate reason for the action (buying of share).
Join the discussion

by varungoel » Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:29 pm
What is the reason the answer could not be C? In the exam i would pick between C & D.

The second boldface part says " they might..." and option C says '..second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.'

Is C incorrect because there is no 'evidence'?
Join the discussion

by 786 » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:51 am
They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.


top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness -> is this conclusion ? doesnt look like . I think this is evidence for the intermediate conclusion -> worrisome rumors must be false .

IMO , the main conclusion is : They might well be overoptimistic .

There is no option that has first part as evidence and second as main conclusion .
IMO , D .

This question is confusing . need expert help !
Join the discussion