Airplanes

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Airplanes

by tdkk123 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:31 am
The only airline providing service for our town announces that because the service is unprofitable, it will discontinue this service next year. Town officials have urged the community to use the airline's service more frequently so that the airline will change its decision. There is no reason to comply with their recommendation, however, for just last week these same officials drove to an out-of-town conference instead of flying.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it presumes, without providing justification, that

A. Increasing the number of tickets sold without increasing ticket prices will be sufficient to make continued air service economically feasible.
B. Suspending service and losing money by continuing service are the airline's only options.
C. The town officials paid for their trip with taxpayers' money rather than their own money.
D. Ground transportation is usually no less expensive than airplane transportation.
E. If the town officials did not follow their own advice, then that advice is not worth following.

Please help with reasoning.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:40 am
A) nothing mentioned about ticket price.
B) again nothing mentioned. (unprofitable and losing money are not same)
C) out of context. nothing is mentioned regarding this.
D) irrelevant
E) Correct. Conclusion is based on these lines only. (There is no reason to comply with recommendation because they themselves don't follow it.)
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:18 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:6 members

by dhonu121 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:12 am
I guess, the reasoning that they are talking about here is the conclusion of the argument.
Essentially, this is a weaken the conclusion question.
Also, here we have to pick the answer choice that is the assumption in the argument while deriving the conclusion.
Hnce E is the right answer.
OA please.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tdkk123 » Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:00 am
OA e

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:13 am
Now what is the assumption behind the argument??/
It says ..


The only airline providing service for our town announces that because the service is unprofitable, it will discontinue this service next year. Town officials have urged the community to use the airline's service more frequently so that the airline will change its decision. There is no reason to comply with their recommendation, however, for just last week these same officials drove to an out-of-town conference instead of flying.


now underlined part is conclusion. The author says, the advice of the officials will not work as ... they themselves are not following that...

now look into the options available.

A. Increasing the number of tickets sold without increasing ticket prices will be sufficient to make continued air service economically feasible.
B. Suspending service and losing money by continuing service are the airline's only options.
C. The town officials paid for their trip with taxpayers' money rather than their own money.
D. Ground transportation is usually no less expensive than airplane transportation.
E. If the town officials did not follow their own advice, then that advice is not worth following.
This time no looking back!!!
Navami