BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Knewton Problem doubt- Experts Help!

Expert replies
by akhilsuhag » Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:56 am
On the knewton quant lesson their is a problem that asks to find the "multiples and factors of 12, 16 and 18 between 1 and 75."

To me it sounded that we would have to exclude 1 and 75 and look at numbers between them whereas when the question was solved by the tutors they included 1 in the factors. Do we always include the border values in GMAT questions. Does the phrase- 'between 1 and 75' automatically include 1 and 75.

I found the question to be a little ambiguous. Should it not be numbers between 1 and 75 inclusive or something. Or is this the usual way the GMAT frames the question.


Hoping you could clear this.

Akhil
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Frankenstein » Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:28 am
Hi,
I am no expert, but I believe I make some sense.
Your analysis is fine. Integers between 1 and 75(unless inclusive is stated) means integers from 2 to 74. Btw, if you can mention the session and the time frame of the lesson, I will check that part as well.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by akhilsuhag » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:02 pm
Hey,

Thanks for getting back.

This is in Session 13- Quantitative Review. Check out the question at 14:15.
I did it considering values from 2 to 74 but the tutors included 1 as well.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:35 pm
Hi,
Okay. I just checked that part. The question is actually :
'Which of the following numbers have exactly as many unique positive factors as unique multiples between 1 and 75?'
12,16,18.
Everything is fine with this question. When it comes to factors we need to count all the factors(including 1).
'between 1 and 75' applies only to the multiples.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by akhilsuhag » Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:47 pm
Yeah it does make sense when you look at it that way. But it makes it more of an English interpretation question than a maths one. Though I still think the language could be made better and more understanding.

Thanks frankenstein for your time!!
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:52 am
No probs. Yes, there is a scope for improvement of the wording in the question.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion