BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Evaluate Argument type question method

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Thu Aug 18, 2011 2:07 pm
shoot4greatness wrote:Hi ya'll,

Just have a small q. Is it ok to accept "new" infos in evaluating argument questions or do we only accept stated infos in stimulus?
in weaken and strenghten questions new info is highly welcome as long as it weakens the link or supports it.
But in must-be-true, draw a conclusion, and assumptiom questions it is NOT! We have to stay within the text given!
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:57 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by shoot4greatness » Thu Aug 18, 2011 2:14 pm
I'm not concerned about weakening or must be true. Those two are different types. I am specifically asking evaluating the argument type questions. Thanks for your input though.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1