BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question on Inequalities

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:55 pm
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:33 pm
Best to translate prompt to
a + 1/a < 2b?
in my opinion.

Plugging in numbers works well here. Whenever there are no limitations on negative numbers I like to start there.

Try these and see what happens:

If a = -5
b = -3, or b = -2
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by Spartacus2000 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:49 am
This might be a stupid question but can you illustrate how you re-translated the question stem?

Thanks,
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:48 am
No, it's a good question.
Is 1/a - b < b - a?
When I see this, my immediate thought it to try to combine the a's on one side and the b's on the other side. It's not this is always going to be the best possible thing to do, but I find that in general it helps me see what's going on more clearly.

So, start by adding b to both sides, in order to cancel out the (-b) on the left:
1/a - b + b < b - a + b

Simplify:
1/a < 2b - a

Now, do the same with the (-a) on the right:
1/a + a < 2b - a + a
1/a + a < 2b

Definitely ask if you have further questions.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by Spartacus2000 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:27 pm
Ok, this is my fault but I should added the () - that's why I could not get the translation

The question is:

Is 1/(a-b) < b -a?

Sorry about that.
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:21 am
Okay, no worries. For this question, it is critical to recognize that (a-b) and (b-a) are opposites of one another.

In other words, (a-b) = -(b-a)
Or, (b-a) = -(a-b)

From this, we can conclude that one of them is always positive, and one of them is always negative.
(a-b) cannot be zero because we can't have 1/0.

Therefore, in order for
1/(a-b) < b-a

We need (a-b) to be the negative one, and (b-a) to be the positive one.
That way, the inequality will be negative < positive
In other words, we need a < b.

Statement 1:
Tells us exactly what we need. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
1 < |a - b|
Here, either one could be the bigger one, which means that (a-b) could be positive, or could be negative. Insufficient.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by Spartacus2000 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:32 pm
Thanks.

That was really helpful.
Join the discussion