BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Veritas Quant 700 + question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by edge » Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:31 pm
My answer is E.

The two statements are obviously insufficient by themselves.
Combining them, you can either solve the set quadratically or plug in numbers. I chose the latter path and chose (12, 4) and (4, 12) for (X, Y). Plugging them into the equation in the question, you get different answers.
Join the discussion

by naveen451 » Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:31 pm
IMO E
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:21 pm
You can use the bowtie method to add the two fractions:

1/x + 2/y = y + 2x/(xy)

thus in order to solve we need something that tells us both the value of y + 2x and the value of xy.

Statement 1 does not help for either - it can't be maniuplated to y + 2x and you can't manipulate to xy. Thus you are left with BCE

Statement 2 gives you one piece, but not y + 2x so it is not enough - CE

Together you still don't have y + 2x so it is not enough - and the answer is E
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by gmatboost » Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:46 pm
My guess is that something that can save you time on questions like this is to say to yourself:

"Any time I see algebraic fractions with different denominators, I am going to put them over a common denominator."

It's almost always helpful, and it's usually necessary.

If you did this, but then weren't sure if the combined statements were sufficient, then consider the following about systems of equations in which one equation is XY = ? and the other is X+Y = ?:

1. In these systems, there are usually 2 solutions, and X can be either one as long as Y is the other one.
2. You can often guess what the numbers are by looking at the equations. In this case, it's not unreasonable to say that you could guess that the two numbers are 4 and 12.
3. Once you know that EITHER x = 12, y = 4 OR x = 4, y = 12, you can plug both sets of values into the prompt and see what happens. In this case, different outcomes. In other cases, they could be the same.
4. If all else fails, you can use substitution to set up a quadratic equation and find the two values that way. Here, x = 16 - y, so you can substitute to get (16 - y)*y = 48 and solve the resulting quadratic equation. This is messy though. Ty to guess at the two numbers first.

Hope this helps. Let me know if the time sink was something totally different.[/url]
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
Join the discussion

by ajaykpat » Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:51 pm
I have approached question in this way:


now from St 1. X+Y=16 ( Not sufficient)
st 2. XY=48 ( Not sufficient)

For scenario St.1 + St.2:

Consider st 1.

X+Y=16
dividing bot side of equation with XY then we have ==> X+Y/XY = 16/XY
==> 1/X + 1/Y = 16/48=1/3 ( XY=48 frm st.2 )


Now from question we have 1/X + 2/Y = 1/X + 1/Y + 1/Y

==> 1/3 + 1/Y

Hence , we cant get the solution of given equation using both statements

ANS= E
Join the discussion