BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

number of employees

Expert replies
by finance » Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:41 am
MegaTech and UltraCorp are considering a
merger to form the MegaUltraTech
Corporation. Does MegaTech have more
employees than UltraCorp?
(1) The average (arithmetic mean) age
of UltraCorp employees is 32.8, while the
average age of MegaTech employees
is 27.2.
(2) If the merger goes through and all
employees from both companies remain
employed, the average (arithmetic mean)
age of the MegaUltraTech employees will
be 31.4.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:56 am
I think its (C) i.e. both statements combined

Let total number of employess in MegaTech = m (ages of each be m1, m2 , m3 .... )
Let total number of employess in UltraTech = u (ages of each be u1, u2 , u3 .... )

We need to find if m > u , or, is [m / u] > 1 (since m and u will always be positive)

(1)
[ m1 + m2 + ....] / m = 27.2
[ u1 + u2 + ....] / u = 32.8

This itself doesn't say anything about the numbers, so not sufficient

(2)
[m1 + m2 + ...u1 + u2 + ... ] / [m + n ] = 31.4

Again, not enough info to deduce the relationshup between m and n

combining:

Form (1), we get
m1 + m2 + .... = 27.2m
u1 + u2 + .... = 32.8u

Putting this in (2)

27.2m + 32.8u = 31.4m + 31.4u
1.4 u = 3.8m

This is enough to establish a relationship between m and u, hence sufficient.
Join the discussion

by finance » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:07 am
Thank you!

The only explanation provided in my book was that since the average age for Ultra Tech employees is closer to the average age of all employees taken together after the merger, then we could conclude that the number of employees in Ultra Tech is higher. Now that I read your solution, I see it makes sense to me.
Join the discussion

by kmittal82 » Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:36 am
The book's answer also makes sense, but its not all that obvious at first sight.

If in doubt, go the old fashioned way :)
Join the discussion

by naveen451 » Thu Jul 21, 2011 3:53 am
this problem can be solved easily by allegation method
Join the discussion

by mirantdon » Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:40 am
+1 for C .
btw . lol naveen .. allegation method ?!!

you would get the proportion but not the number
Join the discussion