Not sure what topic this is?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:53 pm
Proportion mv<pv is true for m<p when v is positive only, given this answers our question with statement(1) Sufficient and we answer yes. Statement(2) m<0 means v>0 and is Sufficient.
d

topic of question is inequality
Spartacus2000 wrote:If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

(1) m < p
(2) m < 0
Success doesn't come overnight!

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 9:38 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:620

by SUHAILK » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:53 pm
Spartacus2000 wrote:If mv < pv < 0, is v > 0?

(1) m < p
(2) m < 0
Statement 1: m < p for above inequality ( mv < pv < 0) to hold m & p must have same sign.

case 1: m<p m>0 & p>0

so in this case for mv < pv < 0 to be true v<0

m < p when multiplied by v (v<0) the inequality will become mv > pv => v cannot be <0

case 2: m <0 & p<0 => v > 0

mv < pv < 0 is true

=> v can only be >0 = Statement 1 is sufficient

Statement 2:

m < 0

we know mv <0 => if m< 0 v must be >0 ..hence Statement 2 is sufficient


Answer is D

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:02 pm
v(m-p) < 0 meaning v<0 or m-p <0

a m<p meaning m-p < 0 means v>0 sufficient.

b m<0 check for p + and - values.

p+ (m-p) < 0 means v> 0
p- pv< 0 means v>0.
sufficient.

thus D it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:06 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by edvhou812 » Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:34 pm
Topic would be torture / irrelevant to grad school. ;)


mv < pv < 0, is v > 0

My first bit of advice is to be super careful with DS. They seem to be built on tricking people. Doesn't hurt to do a little bit of extra checking when working on these.

1) m<p
I used values to check different scenarios. For example:
m = -3, p = -2, v=4
-12 < -8 < 0
When I made v negative and assigned new values to m and p to satisfy m<p, it messed everything up.
(Sufficient)

2) m<0
we know that m is negative, and that mv<0, so v must be positive. (sufficient)

Answer: D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 28 times
GMAT Score:770

by goalevan » Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:52 pm
We are given mv < pv < 0.

If v > 0, then m < p < 0, or m < p, p < 0, AND m < 0.

The contrapositive must hold true: if v <= 0, then m >= p, p >= 0, and m >= 0.

Thus you can immediately rephrase the question stem as follows:

Is either m < p, p < 0, or m < 0?

Statement 1) check, sufficient.
Statement 2) check, sufficient.

D