BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities

Expert replies
by divya23 » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:44 am
IF M>0 AND N>0 ,IS M+X/N+X>M/N
1.M<N
2.X>0

ANS = BOTH

we can here solve d inequality
n(m+x)>m(n+x)
nm+nx>mn+mx
nx>mx
n>m
is the approach right then why is one not the ans??
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Frankenstein » Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:59 am
Hi,
You cannot cross multiply in inequalities because we do not know the sign of x which can change the sign of n+x because in doing so, we are effectively multiplying both sides by n(n+x). We know that n>0 but we do not know the sign of (n+x). If n+x is positive the inequality holds. If it is negative, the inequality changes.
Is M+X/N+X>M/N ?
We need to check: Is m+x/n+x-m/n > 0?
m+x/n+x-m/n = [(m+x)n - m(n+x)]/n(n+x) = x(n-m)/n(n+x)
From(1): m<n. So, n-m>0. But we do not know the sign of x/(n+x)
Not Sufficient
From(2): x>0. But we do not know the sign of (n-m)/(n+x)
Not Sufficient
Both(1)&(2) : n-m >0, n>0, x>0, n+x>0
So, x(n-m)/n(n+x) > 0
Sufficient

Hence, C
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:24 pm
M+x / N+x > M/N gives (MN+Nx-MN-MX)(N+x)*N > 0 x(N-M)/(N+x)*N > 0

a N>M tells nothing about x here. Not sufficient.

b x>0 tells nothing about N-M. not sufficient.

a+b means both numerator and denominator positive. C it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by vaibhavdoshi » Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:30 am
The Inequality holds true for all values of M,N when X is positive.

IMO B
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:50 am
This question is essentially testing our knowledge of the following rule:

If we take a fraction with positive numerator and denominator, and we increase the numerator and denominator by the same amount, then the value of the fraction approaches (i.e., gets closer to) 1

Examples:
If we take 1/2 and increase the numerator and denominator by 3, we get 4/5
Notice that 4/5 is closer to 1 than 1/2 is

Similarly, if we take 3/2 and increase the numerator and denominator by 3, we get 6/5
Notice that 6/5 is closer to 1 than 3/2 is.

So, if we begin with a fraction greater than 1, then adding a positive number to numerator and denominator will decrease the value of the fraction, and if we begin with a fraction less than 1, then adding a positive number to numerator and denominator will increase the value of the fraction.

Statement 1 ensures that the initial fraction (M/N) is less than 1, but it does not ensure that we are adding a positive value to the numerator and denominator. INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2 ensures that we are adding a positive value to the numerator and denominator, but it does not tell us whether the initial fraction (M/N) is greater than or less than 1. INSUFFICIENT

The statements combined ensure both. SUFFICIENT

So the answer is C

Cheers,
Brent
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Tue Jun 28, 2011 7:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:59 am
We can also simplify the question: intead of a > b, we can rewrite the question as a - b >0 and get a common denominator:

(m+x)/(n+x) - m/n = x(n - m)/n(n+x) > 0 ?
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion