BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

value

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:25 pm
To find

k-x+k-y+k-w = 3k - (x+y+w)

Stmt I

x,y,w three consecutive odd intgers. Could be anything and we still dont know what k is

INSUFF

Stmt II

x+y+w/3 = 3

x+y+w=9

INSUFF

Together the three numbers ar 1,3,5 but still no idea on k

I would choose E and must be missing something if its B
Join the discussion

by AJ2009 » Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:47 pm
I also thin it is E, don't see where the value of K could come from.
Join the discussion

by jackcrystal » Fri Feb 13, 2009 10:28 pm
it got to be - E
Join the discussion

by Uri » Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:31 am
there is no way that we can find the value of this equation without knowing "k". IMHO (E)
could you please specify the source of this problem?
Join the discussion

by awesomeusername » Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:22 am
I also got the same thing. We can solve for all variables but k.
Join the discussion

by MJ23 » Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:02 pm
(1) insufficient can be any numbers

(2) (w+x+y)/3 = k
3k = w+x+y

if we rearange the formula in the questions it reads as 3k - (w+x+y)
substitute and you get (w+x+y) - (w+x+y)

2 is sufficient therefore answer is B

is this correct? it makes sense if the average of the three variables is K and the three variables are getting subtracted from K and added together, it should net out to 0
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:27 pm
MJ23 wrote:(1) insufficient can be any numbers

(2) (w+x+y)/3 = k
3k = w+x+y

if we rearange the formula in the questions it reads as 3k - (w+x+y)
substitute and you get (w+x+y) - (w+x+y)

2 is sufficient therefore answer is B

is this correct? it makes sense if the average of the three variables is K and the three variables are getting subtracted from K and added together, it should net out to 0
I guess you've changed statement 2 here to "the mean of w, x and y is k" instead of "the mean of w, x and y is 3" (as it was written in the original post above). With that change, the answer is certainly B, as you've shown. Since the OA is B, I'm guessing there was either a typo in the original post or in the source of the question, and I think your suggested rewrite is what the question was intended to be. It is certainly a more interesting question that way, since when Statement 2 reads as it does in the original post, it's pretty obvious that the answer is E, since we have no information about k and we need information about k.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion