BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

integers

Expert replies
by cans » Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:22 am
If k is an integer greater than 1, does k = 2?

(1) a and b are any two positive factors of k, where a ≠ b, and a - b must be odd.

(2) k has only two positive factors.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:31 am
Hi,
From(1): a and b are any two numbers. So, lets take b=1 as 1 is factor of any integer. So a must be even(as diff. is odd). 2 is a factor of every even number greater than 2. So, the diff. between any even number and 2(factor of even number) is even(not odd). So, only possible value of k is 2.
Sufficient

From(2): k has 2 positive factors. So k is prime
Insufficient

Hence, A
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:35 am
IMO C
because
(1) is not sufficent as for any number k (say 12) two factors are 3,4 and a-b=1 is odd and say for k=44 two factors are 4 and 11 and a-b=7 which is odd and still value of k!=2, on the other hand if k=2 then a-b=2-1=1 is odd so k CAN be 2 but not necessary
(2) this tells us that k is a prime no. so say k=2,3,5,7 etc here too, k CAN be 2 but not necessary

now combining (1) and (2) it tells that there are only two factors for K and their difference must be odd.. there is only one such value for k ie.k=2(apart from that if u take any prime no. then the difference will be an even number eg. 7 so 7-1=6 even, 13 so 13-1=12 even) hence sufficient[spoiler][/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Wed Jun 08, 2011 9:02 am
Yeah, I believe statement(1) has more to do with the wording. 'a and b are any two positive factors of k'. So, I feel it is true for any 2 factors of k. That is how I interpret it, not that I am correct.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Jun 08, 2011 9:12 am
Frankenstein wrote:Yeah, I believe statement(1) has more to do with the wording. 'a and b are any two positive factors of k'. So, I feel it is true for any 2 factors of k. That is how I interpret it, not that I am correct.
ya i get your point, i stand corrected. in that case IMO A
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:47 pm
IMO C

k > 1

1) a and b are any two positive factors of k, where a ≠ b, and a - b must be odd.

one of a and b must be even and other must be odd. let a=2, b=1

for k=2, a=2 and b=1 is a factor of 2, however
for k=6, a=2 and b=1 is a factor of 6. K can be any even integer greater than equal to 2. so Insufficient.

2) k has only two positive factors

means k is prime number.
k can be 2,3,5,7... Insufficient.

Combining 1 and 2
As a and b are any two positive factors of k and because "2" is the only prime number that can divide by an even number, k=2. Sufficient.
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:49 pm
Frankenstein wrote:Yeah, I believe statement(1) has more to do with the wording. 'a and b are any two positive factors of k'. So, I feel it is true for any 2 factors of k. That is how I interpret it, not that I am correct.
@Frankenstein,

According to your interpretation and explanation , should n't it be : 'a and b are ONLY two positive factors of k' ?

The word ONLY restricts us to think in terms of prime #s. However statement 1 says ANY. What do you think about this?
Join the discussion

by phanideepak » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:43 pm
smackmartine wrote:IMO C

k > 1

1) a and b are any two positive factors of k, where a ≠ b, and a - b must be odd.

one of a and b must be even and other must be odd. let a=2, b=1

for k=2, a=2 and b=1 is a factor of 2, however
for k=6, a=2 and b=1 is a factor of 6. K can be any even integer greater than equal to 2. so Insufficient.

2) k has only two positive factors

means k is prime number.
k can be 2,3,5,7... Insufficient.

Combining 1 and 2
As a and b are any two positive factors of k and because "2" is the only prime number that can divide by an even number, k=2. Sufficient.
you made a mistake there the point is that ANY two factors when u subtract the number should be ODD For example lets take 6 as you have taken it before

factors of 6 : 1,2,3,6 Now subtract 3 and 1 3-1 = 2 So NOT ODD

lets take another even integer greater than 2 but has no odd factors. example 8

factors of 8 are : 1,2,4,8 now subtract 4 and 2 4-2 = 2 which is NOT ODD not odd again so the only number which satisfies that condition is 2

Answer IMO is A
Last edited by phanideepak on Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:55 pm
ANY two factors when u subtract the number should be ODD


I guess I got it.Thanks
Join the discussion

by cans » Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:25 pm
OA A
in a) any two factors means it should be true for all the pairs of factors and not just one.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion