American & Japenses business

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

American & Japenses business

by vikram4689 » Sat May 14, 2011 2:56 am
In recent years, Western business managers have been heeding the exhortations of business journalists and academics (5) to move their companies toward long-term, collaborative
"strategic partnerships" with their external business partners (e.g., suppliers). The experts' advice comes as (10) a natural reaction to numerous studies conducted during the past decade that compared Japanese production and supply practices with those of the rest of the world. (15) The link between the success of a certain well-known Japanese automaker and its effective management of its suppliers, for example, has led to an unques(20) tioning belief within Western management circles in the value of strategic partnerships. Indeed, in the automobile sector all three United States manufacturers and (25) most of their European competitors have launched programs to reduce their total number of suppliers and move toward having strategic partnerships with a few. (30) However, new research concerning supplier relationships in various industries demonstrates that the widespread assumption of Western managers and business (35) consultants that Japanese firms manage their suppliers primarily through strategic partnerships is unjustified. Not only do Japanese firms appear to conduct a far (40) smaller proportion of their business through strategic partnerships than is commonly believed, but they also make extensive use of "market-exchange" relationships, (45) in which either party can turn to the marketplace and shift to different business partners at will, a practice usually associated with Western manufacturers.

Q1: The passage is primarily concerned with

A. examining economic factors that may have contributed to the success of certain Japanese companies
B. discussing the relative merits of strategic partnerships as compared with those of market-exchange relationship
C. challenging the validity of a widely held assumption about how Japanese firms operate
D. explaining why Western companies have been slow to adopt a particular practice favored by Japanese companies
E. pointing out certain differences between Japanese and Western supplier relationships

[spoiler]IMO:A | OA:C[/spoiler]
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Sat May 14, 2011 7:30 pm
Well..i get C for this, but i would love to know your reasoning behind A.
A-examining economic factors that may have contributed to the success of certain Japanese companies - startegic partnership is discussed here..i dnt see any economic considerations being mentioned in the para.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Sat May 14, 2011 8:41 pm
well i was confused b/w A & C. In A "economic" was the problem and in C "challenging" was the problem.

I marked A because passage is examining the ways of Japanese do business and ONLY in the last few sentences it challenges. So i thought marking an option that says "passage is PRIMARILY concerned with CHALLENGING....." would not be correct
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 234
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:02 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:3 members

by champmag » Tue May 17, 2011 11:52 pm
1 for C.

The later part of the passage actually challenges the widely held assumption of how the Japanese firms work.

This is the main purpose of the passage.