BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Roots question

Expert replies
by sachin_yadav » Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:07 am
If x is a positive integer, is sqroot x an integer ?

(1). sqroot 4x is an integer. (both 4 and x are under square root)
(2). sqroot 3x is not an integer. (both 3 and x are under square root)

Answer is A

Thanks & Regards
Sachin
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:15 am
Don't see why its A

(1)
sqrt(4x) = 2sqrt(x) [2 with a + or -]

Now, for the above to be an integer, sqrt(x) could be 1.5, 2.5 etc, or sqrt(x) could be 3
So, its shouldn't be sufficient.

(2)
sqrt(3) x sqrt(x).
This can only be an integer if x = 3. For all other values, its not an integer, so the question is basically saying x is not equal to 3

Combine (1) + (2), all we know is x is not 3, so still not sufficient to answer the question

Should be (E) I think.
Join the discussion

by ldoolitt » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:05 pm
kmittal82 wrote:Don't see why its A

(1)
sqrt(4x) = 2sqrt(x) [2 with a + or -]

Now, for the above to be an integer, sqrt(x) could be 1.5, 2.5 etc, or sqrt(x) could be 3
So, its shouldn't be sufficient.

(2)
sqrt(3) x sqrt(x).
This can only be an integer if x = 3. For all other values, its not an integer, so the question is basically saying x is not equal to 3

Combine (1) + (2), all we know is x is not 3, so still not sufficient to answer the question

Should be (E) I think.
I just wanted to point out the flawed reasoning. sqrt(x) cannot be 1.5 or 2.5 because 1.5 and 2.5 squared are not integers and the problem stem specifically states that x must be an integer.

The rule that you are looking for here is the following:

"The square root of an integer that is not a perfect square is irrational"

And the product of an irrational number and 2 is always irrational. Hence x must be a perfect square to satisfy statement (1) and by definition sqrt(x) is an integer.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:39 am
Can also see in this way...for Op A

sqroot 4x = 2*sqroot x

Now, 2*sqroot x = INT only if

condition 1:- sqroot x = vales like 1.5, 2.5 or y.5 (decimal value = 5)

NO Int value of X yields the above value

condition 2:- sqroot x = INT

Now condition 1 is INVALID as given the question that X = +ve INT

so it means sqroot x = INT

Hence A
Join the discussion

by kmittal82 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:21 pm
Yikes, I'm making too many mistakes, thanks for pointing out my flawed reasoning :)
Join the discussion

by ldoolitt » Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:19 pm
kmittal82 wrote:Yikes, I'm making too many mistakes, thanks for pointing out my flawed reasoning :)
Ha I didn't realize that came out sort of condescending (the flawed reasoning part). No harm meant!
Join the discussion

by force5 » Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:48 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by sachin_yadav » Sun Apr 03, 2011 8:43 pm
Thank you very much ldoolitt and atulmangal. Really appreciate for your help.

Thanks & Regards
Sachin
Join the discussion