BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inqualities

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by force5 » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:47 am
IMO A

question says 3x+2y>20
stmnt 1 (sufficient)

x>y+1
( multiplying by 2 and adding to stem)

x>4.4 and y>3.2
which gives us 4x+y>20 ( for all values)

stmnt 2 (insufficient)

y<5 (can have various values)
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:06 am
I got Y<5 is sufficient here...

using A

if x > Y+1 then x~= y+2
3(y+2)+2y>20 => 5y+6>20
y ~= 3 x=5

is 4x+y>20 yes

IMO D here
Join the discussion

by srcc25anu » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:18 am
i tried to plot the above inequalities on a graph and feel its E (cannot be solved even by both statements)

any more explanations on this one???
Join the discussion

by force5 » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:35 am
Hi Anu i really feel Stmnt A will give you the answer.

BTW Kevin what is the OA????
Join the discussion

by clock60 » Mon Mar 21, 2011 12:51 pm
hi guys
got A here, my reasoning
if 3x+2y>20 does 4x+y>20
(1) x-y>1, here summing both 3x+2y>20 and x-y>1. gives us 4x+y>21, thus if 4x+y>21, 4x+y must be greater that 20
suff
(2)y<5 insuff to prove this, again sum 3x+2y>20, and y<5, this lead us to 3x+y>15
x=5, y=1 then 3*5+1=16>15, and 4x+y=4*5+1=21>20 the answer is yes
x=1,y=15, then 3*1+15=18>15, but 4*1+15=19<20 the answer is no
insuff
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:41 pm
srcc25anu wrote:i tried to plot the above inequalities on a graph and feel its E (cannot be solved even by both statements)

any more explanations on this one???
If 3x + 2y > 20, is 4x + y > 20 ?

(1) x > y + 1
(2) y < 5


Solution:
Consider first (1) alone.
It says x > y + 1.
Or x - y > 1.------------(a)
The main question says that 3x + 2y > 20.------------(b)
Adding (a) and (b) we get that 4x + y > 21.
This means that 4x+2y > 20.
Or (1) alone is sufficient.
Next consider (2) alone.
It says that y < 5.
Or -5y > -25.----------(c)
Now, 3x + 2y > 20 implies that 12x + 8y > 80.---------(d)
Adding (c) and (d), we get that 12x + 3y > 55.
Or 4x + y > 18 1/3.
This is not sufficient to tell us whether 4x + y > 20 or not.
Or (2) alone is not sufficient.

The correct answer is (A)
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:55 pm
Statement (1) x>y+1, x-y>1
3x + 2y > 20 Plus x-y>1 ---> 4x+y>21 Sufficient;

Statement (2) y<5 OR -y>-5 Plus 3x + 2y > 20 ---> 3x+y>15. Verifying x ---> -y>-5 Plus 3x+y>15 x>10/3
Not Sufficient

IOM A
kevincanspain wrote:If 3x + 2y > 20, is 4x + y > 20 ?

(1) x > y + 1
(2) y < 5
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:11 pm
Let me use Y<5 one more time with Y= 4, Y= -2, (Y= 6 and Y = 20)

at y = 4 ; 3x+2y>20 will give x>4 => 4x+y > 20 satisfies
at y = -2; 3x+2y>20 will give x>8 => 4x+y > 20 satisfies
at y = 6; 3x+2y>20 will give x>3 => 4x+y >20 is not satisfied
at y =20; x is -ve so 4x is more negitive... so not satisfied

So Y< 5 is doing good.. what am I missing Night reader/Anurag
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:56 pm
nobody said that y can't be 4 and x can't be >4

conditions given y<5 and x>10/3 and in fact y could be -2,000,000 and/or x could be 2,000,000
the discomfort (trouble/problem/issue/question/doubt) with your ascertainment about y=4 and x>4 is fixing areas which are fixed already that is 5<y and x>10/3. We need 100% validation, BUT here it's missing; the ranges are not fixed the way we like OR you like. x could be less OR greater than (20-15) ... the missing quantity RHS
HSPA wrote:Let me use Y<5 one more time with Y= 4, Y= -2, (Y= 6 and Y = 20)

at y = 4 ; 3x+2y>20 will give x>4 => 4x+y > 20 satisfies
at y = -2; 3x+2y>20 will give x>8 => 4x+y > 20 satisfies
at y = 6; 3x+2y>20 will give x>3 => 4x+y >20 is not satisfied
at y =20; x is -ve so 4x is more negitive... so not satisfied

So Y< 5 is doing good.. what am I missing Night reader/Anurag
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:26 pm
HSPA wrote:Let me use Y<5 one more time with Y= 4, Y= -2, (Y= 6 and Y = 20)

at y = 4 ; 3x+2y>20 will give x>4 => 4x+y > 20 satisfies
at y = -2; 3x+2y>20 will give x>8 => 4x+y > 20 satisfies
at y = 6; 3x+2y>20 will give x>3 => 4x+y >20 is not satisfied
at y =20; x is -ve so 4x is more negitive... so not satisfied

So Y< 5 is doing good.. what am I missing Night reader/Anurag
Your calculations show that the further y grow from 5, the more certain you are that 4x+y is indeed greater than 20. At y=-2, 4x alone is already at 32. Do the opposite: try using a 4<y<5 (get y closer to 5)

at y = 4.5 ; 3x+2y>20 will give x>11/3 => 4x+y will not necessarily satisfy >20
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Tue Mar 22, 2011 2:55 am
kevincanspain wrote:If 3x + 2y > 20, is 4x + y > 20 ?

(1) x > y + 1
(2) y < 5
4x + y > 20 if 4x + y >= 3x + 2y i.e x >= y

If x < y, 4x + y < 3x + 2y, and 4x + y may be less than, greater than or equal to 20

(1) IF x > y + 1, x > y SUFF
(2) If y < 5 , since x > (20 - 2y)/3, x > 10/3.


If y is slightly less than 5 and x slightly greater than 10/3, 4x + y will be close to 40/3 + 5 = 55/3 < 20

However, if y < 0, x> 0 and the answer would be yes

NOT SUFF

Arurag's comments on (2) are very nice!
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion