BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS Prob from GMAT Prep

Expert replies
by nishant1309 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:58 pm
Henry purchased 3 items during a sale. He received 20% discount off regular price of the most expensive item and a 10% discount off regular price off each of the other 2 items. Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?

1. Regular price for most expensive item: $50 & regular price of the next expensive item: $ 20.

2. Regular price for least expensive item: $ 15.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Night reader » Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:09 pm
let us call the most exp. item A, the other two items B and C. We need to find if (0.8A+0.1B+0.1C)/(A+B+C)>0.85
st(1) A=50 and B=C=20 --> (40+18+18)/90<0.85 hence we can answer No on this question, Sufficient;
st(2) we have only C or B=15 BUT A can be anything, hence Not Sufficient

answer A
nishant1309 wrote:Henry purchased 3 items during a sale. He received 20% discount off regular price of the most expensive item and a 10% discount off regular price off each of the other 2 items. Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?

1. Regular price for most expensive item: $50 & regular price of the next expensive item: $ 20.

2. Regular price for least expensive item: $ 15.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by nishant1309 » Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:56 pm
Night reader wrote:let us call the most exp. item A, the other two items B and C. We need to find if (0.8A+0.1B+0.1C)/(A+B+C)>0.85
st(1) A=50 and B=C=20 --> (40+18+18)/90<0.85 hence we can answer No on this question, Sufficient;
st(2) we have only C or B=15 BUT A can be anything, hence Not Sufficient

answer A
nishant1309 wrote:Henry purchased 3 items during a sale. He received 20% discount off regular price of the most expensive item and a 10% discount off regular price off each of the other 2 items. Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?

1. Regular price for most expensive item: $50 & regular price of the next expensive item: $ 20.

2. Regular price for least expensive item: $ 15.
@ Night rider: To my understanding:
1. we need to check whether (0.2A+0.1B+0.1C)/(A+B+C) > 0.15.
2. St. 1 doesn't specifies regular price of least expensive item. You have assumed it to be = $ 20.

Please correct me if i got the question wrong.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:08 pm
look I have not assumed anything -- you are given three items // correct?
one is most expensive with discount 20% // correct?
and the other two less expensive with discount 10% // correct?
in st(1) the most expensive item is priced at $50 and the next expensive is priced at $20// correct?
from st(1) you can deduce that the next after next OR just one which is not most expensive could be at MOST $20 //correct?

hence you take A=50, B=C=20 // correct?

if you answer on every query "correct?" yes, please have your doubt resolved.
nishant1309 wrote:
Night reader wrote:let us call the most exp. item A, the other two items B and C. We need to find if (0.8A+0.1B+0.1C)/(A+B+C)>0.85
st(1) A=50 and B=C=20 --> (40+18+18)/90<0.85 hence we can answer No on this question, Sufficient;
st(2) we have only C or B=15 BUT A can be anything, hence Not Sufficient

answer A
nishant1309 wrote:Henry purchased 3 items during a sale. He received 20% discount off regular price of the most expensive item and a 10% discount off regular price off each of the other 2 items. Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?

1. Regular price for most expensive item: $50 & regular price of the next expensive item: $ 20.

2. Regular price for least expensive item: $ 15.
@ Night rider: To my understanding:
1. we need to check whether (0.2A+0.1B+0.1C)/(A+B+C) > 0.15.
2. St. 1 doesn't specifies regular price of least expensive item. You have assumed it to be = $ 20.

Please correct me if i got the question wrong.
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Mar 13, 2011 3:20 pm

Henry purchase 3 items during a sale. He received a 20 percent discount off the regular price of the most
expensive item and a 10 percent discount off the regular price of each of the other 2 items. Was the total
amount of the 3 discounts greater than 15 percent of the sum of the regular prices of the 3 items?
(1) The regular price of the most expensive item was $50, and the regular price of the next most expensive
item was $20
(2) The regular price of the least expensive item was $15.
This is a weighted average question.
How can we combine a 20% discount with a 10% discount to yield a combined discount that is more than 15%?
If the price discounted at 20% equals the sum of the prices discounted at 10%, the resulting discount will be exactly 15%.
Thus, to yield a discount that is more than 15%, the price discounted at 20% must be greater than the sum of the prices discounted at 10%.

Rephrased, the question is asking:

Is the regular price of the most expensive item greater than the sum of the regular prices of the two cheaper items?

Statement 1: The regular price of the most expensive item was $50, and the regular price of the next most expensive
item was $20.

The sum of the prices of the 2 cheaper items cannot be greater than 20+20 = 40.
Thus, the $50 price of the most expensive item must be greater than the sum of the prices of the 2 cheaper items.
Sufficient.

Statement 2: The regular price of the least expensive item was $15.
No way to determine whether the price of the most expensive item is greater than the sum of the prices of the 2 cheaper items.
Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by gig92 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:42 am
nishant1309 wrote:Henry purchased 3 items during a sale. He received 20% discount off regular price of the most expensive item and a 10% discount off regular price off each of the other 2 items. Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?

1. Regular price for most expensive item: $50 & regular price of the next expensive item: $ 20.

2. Regular price for least expensive item: $ 15.
One more :

Stmnt 2: Regular price for least expensive item: $ 15

It doesn't give any idea about prices of other two items.It could be $1000 each or $2000 and $1000
So not Sufficient

Stmnt1:

We know from the discount of 20% on $50 = $10 and the discount of 10% on $20 = $2
So to answer: Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?
We can imagine that third item is of min value of $1 and max of $20 (cause the third item can have the same price as the second one). Now 10% discount of $1 to $20 will go to a max of $2. (ONE can easily imagine that the third item can also be of $20 as there are no restrictions on the price).

The question is: Was the total amount of discount greater than 15% of the sum of the regular prices of all the 3 items?

AND from the information in Stmnt 1, one can always find a unique answer.
Hence [spoiler]A[/spoiler]


NB: This is more of a "all in the head" approach!! Mitch has explained it better with the whole concept. However, sometimes one might not have the bells ringing to see that! So a faster idea in the head may tell you that Stmnt 1 gives enough information to anwser the question.
gig92
Join the discussion