BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

xy coordinate line

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:53 am
is it a GMAT prep question by any chance?
earnest10 wrote:Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:37 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by earnest10 » Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:36 am
rohu27 wrote:is it a GMAT prep question by any chance?
earnest10 wrote:Image
Yes ... it is
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 amFollowed by: 365 members
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times

by VivianKerr » Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:53 am
Here's my thinking:

y = 3x + 2 contain (r,s)?
- yes/no question
- sufficiency determined if we know the value of BOTH r AND s.

(1) (3r + 2 - s)(4r + 9 - s) = 0

One equation with both r and s in it. We cannot solve for the variables individually.

(2) (4r - 6 - s)(3r + 2 - s) = 0

Same issue - one equation with two variables.

If we combine the statements, we have 2 equations with the same 2 variables. Should be suff.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 6:29 pmFollowed by: 10 members
Thanked: 127 times

by Night reader » Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:04 pm
Hello my friend, function is like equation
In the xy plane does the line with equation y = 3x + 2 contain the point ( r , s) ?

1. ( 3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0.
2. (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) =0.
y is s and x is r, now rewrite everything --> s=3r+2 OR 3r+2-s=0 :) /I know you smile too

st(1) BECOMES ridiculously simple ( 3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0 is Not Sufficient, because we have also (4r+9-s) can be 0
st(2) heh, (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) =0; you know everything here --> (3r+2-s) =0 ? Not Sufficient

may be Combined ? st(1&2): both ( 3r+2-s)(4r+9-s) = 0 AND (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s) =0 can be zero if one of common factors is 0 (zero). Only possible with the ( 3r+2-s) = 0 why not Sufficient?

IOM C
Cheers
earnest10 wrote:Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1