-
RadiumBall
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:49 am
- Thanked: 5 times
Hello All,
I have seen several idioms parts bieng placed as far as possible to confuse the reader but how far should we really go to identify an idiom. For example it is very easy to identify idioms like Not only X but also Y but what about the lesser known ones, for example I know that "convey to" is the correct idiom but in this case OG-SC #136 choice B
Whereas the tiny tubes for the conveying of nutrients to bone cells are arrayed in mammals in parallel lines, birds have tubes that
if we need to look at the idiom then can I throw out this option because it has incorrect idiom "conveying of" or am I incorrect because we also have a "to" later on.
Thanks
I have seen several idioms parts bieng placed as far as possible to confuse the reader but how far should we really go to identify an idiom. For example it is very easy to identify idioms like Not only X but also Y but what about the lesser known ones, for example I know that "convey to" is the correct idiom but in this case OG-SC #136 choice B
Whereas the tiny tubes for the conveying of nutrients to bone cells are arrayed in mammals in parallel lines, birds have tubes that
if we need to look at the idiom then can I throw out this option because it has incorrect idiom "conveying of" or am I incorrect because we also have a "to" later on.
Thanks

















