BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAC software question

Expert replies
by jazzwillbe » Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:46 pm
Here's a question from the official GMAT prep software.

The cost of each adult's ticket for a certain concert was $30, and the cost of each child's ticket for the concert was $24. If Hannah purchased tickets for this concert, what was the average(arithmetic mean) cost per ticket?

(1) Hannah purchased twice as many childrens tickets as adult's tickets

(2) Hannah purchased 4 childrens tickets.

Data sufficiency questions guys.

The answer is (A). Am I missing something here.

Thanks
J
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

agree but an error

by jazzwillbe » Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:49 pm
Mark,
Thanks for the post. I do agree that 1st statement is enough. But the 2nd statement says that she bought 4 childrens tickets only, which means that the average is 24.

I think there is an error in the question

Thanks
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:02 pm
Jazzwillbe, I don't think we can make the assumption that "only" 4
children tickets were purchased.

(2) just says that Hannan purchased 4 children tickets and does not
mention how many adult tickets were purchased.
Join the discussion

by getso » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:13 am
Hello Friends,

I'm reopening this post.

Could anybody give the correct explaination to the question posted.

Thanks,
Shobha
Join the discussion

by bigmikefr » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:37 am
The average cost per ticket is (30A+24C)/A+C, where A and C stand for the number of adult tickets and the number of children tickets respectively

(1) Here they tell us that A= 2C. So you can plug A=2 & C=1; then try A=4 & C=2. You will find that on both occasions, the mean is 28 and it does not change. SUFFICIENT

(2) This tell us C=4. But with no further information, we cannot calculate the average. INSUFFICIENT

So A only
Join the discussion

by aspirant1 » Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:08 pm
Could anyone pls help on the assumption here...

b) talks about only child's ticket.

My thought would be, we can still calculate the average cost of the ticket. BECAUSE : question does not talk about number of adult tickets purchased by Hannaf, But only the value of tickets. so the assumption would be average of whatever the ticket she has purchased.

Is this not a right assumption...? pls help
Join the discussion

by kimjone » Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:43 am
aspirant1 wrote:Could anyone pls help on the assumption here...

b) talks about only child's ticket.

My thought would be, we can still calculate the average cost of the ticket. BECAUSE : question does not talk about number of adult tickets purchased by Hannaf, But only the value of tickets. so the assumption would be average of whatever the ticket she has purchased.

Is this not a right assumption...? pls help
I agree with you aspirant, and your train of thought. I chose D because I thought both were sufficient..
Join the discussion

by upkarsgrewal » Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:29 pm
Same here. I chose D. The given information for statement 2 is that she bought 4 Childrens Tickets. That means it can be solved. How is the reader supposed to assume that additional tickets could have been bought. The GMAC is wrong on this question. It's data sufficiency. You are given enough data in statement 2 to decide the average price per tickets. I picked D and I feel its not wrong in any way.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:03 am
first --
OFFICIALLY CORRECT ANSWERS ARE CORRECT!
do not question officially correct answers!

far too many students on this forum make the mistake of questioning the correct answers; please note that doing so is a complete waste of your time and effort. i.e., exactly 0% of the time that you spend posting "isn't this official answer wrong?" is productive, and exactly 100% of that time is wasted.

"is this correct?" is NEVER a productive question to ask about one of GMAC's correct answers -- the answer is always yes.
"is this wrong?" / "is this X type of error?" is NEVER a productive question to ask about one of GMAC's correct answers -- the answer is always no.

instead, the questions you should be asking about correct official answers, if you don't understand them, are:
"why is this correct?"
"how does this work?"
"what understanding am i lacking that i need to understand this choice?"

this is a small, but hugely significant, change to your way of thinking -- you will suddenly find it much easier to understand the format, style, and conventions of the official problems if you dispose of the idea that they might be wrong.

--

second:

on this problem, if you know the conventions by which gmac creates data sufficiency problems, you can actually figure out that the second statement CAN'T mean "4 children's tickets and 0 adult tickets".
here's how:
on an official DS problem, the two numbered statements will NEVER contradict each other. if you think that the two numbered statements are mutually contradictory, your interpretation of at least one of them is definitely wrong.

in this problem, if you interpret the second statement as "4 children's and 0 adult tickets", then that contradicts the first statement, proving that your interpretation of the second statement must be wrong.

--

in any case, once you get over the "isn't this wrong" feeling (no, it's not wrong), you'll learn a valuable lesson about the way GMAC (and the english language in general) frames quantity statements. as another example, if i tell someone "i have two sons", this statement does not mean that i don't have any daughters.

don't question the official answers! LEARN from them!
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion