BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS number theory?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ragz » Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:47 pm
Night reader wrote:Is the sum of all factors of a positive integer m less than 130?
(1) m < 130
(2) m > 130
I think C can be eliminated since both can't be used in conjunction.

For Sentence # 1, let's say m=129, the factors of 129 are 1, 3, 43, 129 and clearly the sum is greater than 130. If we suppose, m=13, the factors are 1 and 13 and the sum is less than 130.

So, choices A and D are eliminated as well.

For Sentence #2, for every m>130, the sum of factors will be greater than 130.

So, choice B is the answer.


Can someone tell me if this analysis is correct?
--
Ravi.
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:51 pm
ragz wrote:
Night reader wrote:Is the sum of all factors of a positive integer m less than 130?
(1) m < 130
(2) m > 130
I think C can be eliminated since both can't be used in conjunction.

For Sentence # 1, let's say m=129, the factors of 129 are 1, 3, 43, 129 and clearly the sum is greater than 130. If we suppose, m=13, the factors are 1 and 13 and the sum is less than 130.

So, choices A and D are eliminated as well.

For Sentence #2, for every m>130, the sum of factors will be greater than 130.

So, choice B is the answer.


Can someone tell me if this analysis is correct?
--
Ravi.
thank you ragz, please attempt the next question in order
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:51 am
see here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-number-th ... tml#327962

note also that this problem couldn't be official (and you should probably become a bit less trusting of the source), for the same reasons i mentioned below that post.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion